Skip to content

Conversation

nverinaud
Copy link

Fixes issue #47 !

@@ -45,15 +45,16 @@
expect(@(subscriptionCount)).to(equal(@1));
});

qck_it(@"shouldn't reconnect after disposal", ^{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fact that there's a test for this means that the behavior is intentional.

I'm not entirely sure why this is the case. Maybe one of the other maintainers does. But I'm not personally comfortable accepting this PR given how little I know about it.

Copy link
Author

@nverinaud nverinaud Dec 4, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes it is intentional. But it should reconnect because it is the way it works in the original Rx (C#).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants