feat: create teams #112
feat: create teams #112
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis update introduces team management features, including models, DTOs, serializers, repository, service, and API view for creating teams. It also refactors Google JWT handling to use RSA key pairs, removes the Google refresh token endpoint, simplifies OAuth flows, and updates environment variables and settings for JWT configuration. Tests and related documentation are updated accordingly. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant TeamListView
participant TeamService
participant TeamRepository
participant UserTeamDetailsRepository
Client->>TeamListView: POST /teams (team data)
TeamListView->>TeamService: create_team(dto, user_id)
TeamService->>TeamRepository: create(team_model)
TeamRepository-->>TeamService: TeamModel
TeamService->>UserTeamDetailsRepository: create_many(user_team_models)
UserTeamDetailsRepository-->>TeamService: [UserTeamDetailsModel]
TeamService-->>TeamListView: CreateTeamResponse
TeamListView-->>Client: 201 Created (team data)
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant GoogleCallbackView
participant Session
Client->>GoogleCallbackView: POST /auth/google/callback (code, state)
GoogleCallbackView->>Session: Validate code/state, generate tokens
GoogleCallbackView-->>Client: Redirect with success or error
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
todo/views/auth.py (1)
100-139: Reduce code duplication and improve error handling.The
frontend_callbackURL is constructed multiple times, violating the DRY principle. Also, the generic exception handling could hide specific OAuth errors.Extract the callback URL construction and improve error handling:
def get(self, request: Request): code = request.query_params.get("code") state = request.query_params.get("state") error = request.query_params.get("error") + frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" if error: - frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" return HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?error={error}") if not code: - frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" return HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?error=missing_code") if not state: - frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" return HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?error=missing_state") stored_state = request.session.get("oauth_state") if not stored_state or stored_state != state: - frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" return HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?error=invalid_state") try: # ... existing code ... - frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" response = HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?success=true") # ... rest of the code ... - except Exception: - frontend_callback = f"{settings.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback" + except GoogleOAuthError as e: + # Log specific OAuth errors + return HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?error=auth_failed&reason={e.error_code}") + except Exception as e: + # Log unexpected errors for debugging return HttpResponseRedirect(f"{frontend_callback}?error=auth_failed")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
.env.example(1 hunks).github/workflows/test.yml(0 hunks)todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py(1 hunks)todo/dto/team_dto.py(1 hunks)todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py(4 hunks)todo/models/team.py(1 hunks)todo/repositories/team_repository.py(1 hunks)todo/serializers/create_team_serializer.py(1 hunks)todo/services/team_service.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/integration/base_mongo_test.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py(0 hunks)todo/tests/unit/views/test_auth.py(8 hunks)todo/urls.py(1 hunks)todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py(4 hunks)todo/views/auth.py(5 hunks)todo/views/team.py(1 hunks)todo_project/settings/base.py(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .github/workflows/test.yml
- todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (8)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py (1)
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
todo_project/settings/base.py (2)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
todo/dto/team_dto.py (1)
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
todo/views/auth.py (1)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
todo/repositories/team_repository.py (1)
Learnt from: VaibhavSingh8
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#83
File: todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py:37-43
Timestamp: 2025-06-17T18:59:14.368Z
Learning: UserRepository.create_or_update is a static method in the todo application, so it should be mocked directly on the class rather than on an instance.
todo/tests/unit/views/test_auth.py (2)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py (3)
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:98-112
Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z
Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)
todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py (1)
todo/dto/team_dto.py (1)
TeamDTO(13-21)
todo/models/team.py (2)
todo/models/common/document.py (1)
Document(9-20)todo/models/common/pyobjectid.py (1)
PyObjectId(4-15)
todo/services/team_service.py (6)
todo/dto/team_dto.py (2)
CreateTeamDTO(6-10)TeamDTO(13-21)todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py (1)
CreateTeamResponse(5-7)todo/models/team.py (2)
TeamModel(9-22)UserTeamDetailsModel(25-38)todo/models/common/pyobjectid.py (1)
PyObjectId(4-15)todo/repositories/team_repository.py (6)
TeamRepository(10-39)UserTeamDetailsRepository(42-79)get_by_id(28-39)create(14-25)create(46-57)create_many(60-79)todo/repositories/user_repository.py (1)
UserRepository(12-56)
todo/views/auth.py (3)
todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py (1)
generate_google_token_pair(102-111)todo/constants/messages.py (1)
AppMessages(2-6)todo/tests/integration/base_mongo_test.py (1)
_set_auth_cookies(65-68)
todo/repositories/team_repository.py (3)
todo/models/team.py (2)
TeamModel(9-22)UserTeamDetailsModel(25-38)todo/repositories/common/mongo_repository.py (1)
MongoRepository(6-28)todo/models/common/pyobjectid.py (1)
PyObjectId(4-15)
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py (4)
todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py (3)
validate_google_access_token(65-81)validate_google_refresh_token(84-99)generate_google_access_token(14-37)todo/exceptions/auth_exceptions.py (3)
TokenMissingError(4-7)TokenExpiredError(10-13)TokenInvalidError(16-19)todo/exceptions/google_auth_exceptions.py (3)
GoogleTokenExpiredError(15-17)GoogleTokenInvalidError(25-27)GoogleRefreshTokenExpiredError(30-32)todo/views/auth.py (5)
get(42-56)get(94-139)get(185-186)_get_cookie_config(141-148)_get_cookie_config(214-221)
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py
[convention] 7-7: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 1-1: Unable to import 'pydantic'
(E0401)
[error] 2-2: Unable to import 'todo.dto.team_dto'
(E0401)
[convention] 5-5: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[refactor] 5-5: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py
[error] 11-11: Unable to import 'todo.constants.messages'
(E0401)
[convention] 32-32: Line too long (111/100)
(C0301)
[warning] 37-37: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise GoogleTokenInvalidError(f'Token generation failed: {str(e)}') from e'
(W0707)
[convention] 56-56: Line too long (111/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 68-68: Line too long (107/100)
(C0301)
[warning] 62-62: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise GoogleTokenInvalidError(f'Refresh token generation failed: {str(e)}') from e'
(W0707)
[convention] 65-65: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 87-87: Line too long (107/100)
(C0301)
[warning] 79-79: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise GoogleTokenInvalidError(f'Invalid token: {str(e)}') from e'
(W0707)
[warning] 81-81: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise GoogleTokenInvalidError(f'Token validation failed: {str(e)}') from e'
(W0707)
[convention] 84-84: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 95-95: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'except Exception as exc' and 'raise GoogleRefreshTokenExpiredError() from exc'
(W0707)
[warning] 97-97: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise GoogleTokenInvalidError(f'Invalid refresh token: {str(e)}') from e'
(W0707)
[warning] 99-99: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise GoogleTokenInvalidError(f'Refresh token validation failed: {str(e)}') from e'
(W0707)
todo/serializers/create_team_serializer.py
[convention] 12-12: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 1-1: Unable to import 'rest_framework'
(E0401)
[convention] 4-4: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[refactor] 4-4: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
todo/dto/team_dto.py
[convention] 21-21: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 1-1: Unable to import 'pydantic'
(E0401)
[convention] 6-6: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[refactor] 6-6: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
[convention] 13-13: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[refactor] 13-13: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
[convention] 2-2: standard import "typing.List" should be placed before third party import "pydantic.BaseModel"
(C0411)
[convention] 3-3: standard import "datetime.datetime" should be placed before third party import "pydantic.BaseModel"
(C0411)
todo/models/team.py
[convention] 33-33: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 38-38: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 1-1: Unable to import 'pydantic'
(E0401)
[refactor] 9-9: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
[refactor] 25-25: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
[convention] 2-2: standard import "typing.ClassVar" should be placed before third party import "pydantic.Field"
(C0411)
[convention] 3-3: standard import "datetime.datetime" should be placed before third party import "pydantic.Field"
(C0411)
todo/services/team_service.py
[convention] 42-42: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 85-85: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[convention] 9-9: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[warning] 85-85: Consider explicitly re-raising using 'raise ValueError(str(e)) from e'
(W0707)
[refactor] 9-9: Too few public methods (1/2)
(R0903)
todo/views/auth.py
[error] 11-11: Unable to import 'todo.utils.google_jwt_utils'
(E0401)
[error] 12-12: Unable to import 'todo.constants.messages'
(E0401)
[warning] 137-137: Catching too general exception Exception
(W0718)
todo/repositories/team_repository.py
[convention] 53-53: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 66-66: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 70-70: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 71-71: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 74-74: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 78-78: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 79-79: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'bson'
(E0401)
[convention] 10-10: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[warning] 38-38: Catching too general exception Exception
(W0718)
[convention] 42-42: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[warning] 7-7: Unused PyObjectId imported from todo.models.common.pyobjectid
(W0611)
todo/tests/unit/views/test_auth.py
[convention] 20-20: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 84-84: Line too long (108/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 127-127: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 133-133: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 145-145: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 176-176: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 195-195: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py
[error] 6-10: Unable to import 'todo.utils.google_jwt_utils'
(E0401)
[error] 11-11: Unable to import 'todo.exceptions.auth_exceptions'
(E0401)
[error] 12-16: Unable to import 'todo.exceptions.google_auth_exceptions'
(E0401)
[warning] 97-97: Catching too general exception Exception
(W0718)
[warning] 128-128: Catching too general exception Exception
(W0718)
[warning] 121-121: Access to a protected member _new_access_token of a client class
(W0212)
[warning] 122-122: Access to a protected member _access_token_expires of a client class
(W0212)
[convention] 165-165: Line too long (104/100)
(C0301)
[warning] 165-165: Access to a protected member _new_access_token of a client class
(W0212)
[warning] 165-165: Access to a protected member _access_token_expires of a client class
(W0212)
todo/views/team.py
[convention] 31-31: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 39-39: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 49-49: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 55-55: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 70-70: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 71-71: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 77-77: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 78-78: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 83-83: Trailing whitespace
(C0303)
[convention] 85-85: Final newline missing
(C0304)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 1-1: Unable to import 'rest_framework.views'
(E0401)
[error] 2-2: Unable to import 'rest_framework.response'
(E0401)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'rest_framework'
(E0401)
[error] 4-4: Unable to import 'rest_framework.request'
(E0401)
[error] 5-5: Unable to import 'django.conf'
(E0401)
[error] 7-7: Unable to import 'todo.serializers.create_team_serializer'
(E0401)
[error] 8-8: Unable to import 'todo.services.team_service'
(E0401)
[error] 9-9: Unable to import 'todo.dto.team_dto'
(E0401)
[error] 10-10: Unable to import 'todo.dto.responses.create_team_response'
(E0401)
[error] 11-11: Unable to import 'todo.dto.responses.error_response'
(E0401)
[error] 12-12: Unable to import 'todo.constants.messages'
(E0401)
[convention] 15-15: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[error] 54-54: Unable to import 'todo.dto.responses.error_response'
(E0401)
[convention] 54-54: Import outside toplevel (todo.dto.responses.error_response.ApiErrorDetail, todo.dto.responses.error_response.ApiErrorSource)
(C0415)
[refactor] 15-15: Too few public methods (1/2)
(R0903)
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
todo/repositories/team_repository.py
7-7: todo.models.common.pyobjectid.PyObjectId imported but unused
Remove unused import: todo.models.common.pyobjectid.PyObjectId
(F401)
🪛 Flake8 (7.2.0)
todo/repositories/team_repository.py
[error] 7-7: 'todo.models.common.pyobjectid.PyObjectId' imported but unused
(F401)
[error] 72-72: continuation line under-indented for visual indent
(E128)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests
todo/repositories/team_repository.py
[error] 7-7: Ruff: todo.models.common.pyobjectid.PyObjectId imported but unused (F401). Remove unused import.
🔇 Additional comments (20)
todo/models/team.py (1)
9-23: Well-designed team model with proper field types and relationships.The model structure is excellent with appropriate use of PyObjectId for MongoDB IDs, proper timestamp handling with UTC timezone, and comprehensive metadata fields. The soft deletion pattern with
is_deletedis a good practice.todo/urls.py (2)
5-5: Good addition of team functionality to URL routing.The import and route addition follows Django conventions and integrates well with the existing URL patterns.
15-15: Properly configured team API endpoint.The teams endpoint is correctly configured and will handle team creation requests through the TeamListView.
todo/tests/integration/base_mongo_test.py (1)
22-24: Proper test configuration for frontend URL support.The addition of
FRONTEND_URLsetting supports the authentication redirect functionality and maintains consistency between test and production environments.todo/serializers/create_team_serializer.py (1)
1-12: LGTM! The serializer implementation is solid.The field definitions are appropriate and follow DRF conventions correctly. The validation logic covers the expected team creation requirements.
todo/dto/team_dto.py (1)
6-21: LGTM! The DTO design is well-structured.Both DTOs appropriately model the data structures for team creation and representation. The field types and optional/required settings align well with the business requirements.
todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py (4)
32-33: LGTM! Correct transition to asymmetric key signing.The change from SECRET_KEY to PRIVATE_KEY is appropriate for RSA-based JWT signing with RS256 algorithm.
56-57: LGTM! Consistent use of PRIVATE_KEY for token generation.The refresh token generation correctly uses the private key for signing.
68-69: LGTM! Correct use of PUBLIC_KEY for token validation.The transition to using PUBLIC_KEY for token verification is appropriate for RSA-based JWT validation.
78-81: Enhanced error handling improves debugging capabilities.The more granular exception handling with specific error messages will help with troubleshooting JWT issues.
todo_project/settings/base.py (1)
123-142: Excellent conditional JWT configuration design.The approach of using different JWT algorithms and keys for testing vs production is well-implemented:
- Testing: HS256 with hardcoded keys for simplicity and speed
- Production: RS256 with environment-provided keys for security
- Flexible: Token lifetimes configurable via environment variables
This design provides good separation of concerns and maintains test isolation while ensuring production security.
todo/services/team_service.py (4)
16-27: LGTM! Proper user validation before team creation.The validation logic correctly checks for the existence of all member IDs and POC ID before proceeding with team creation. This prevents creation of teams with invalid user references.
30-38: LGTM! Clean team model creation and persistence.The team creation logic properly constructs the
TeamModelwith all required fields and uses the repository pattern for persistence.
55-64: LGTM! Proper handling of creator membership.The logic correctly ensures the team creator is added to the team if they're not already included in the member_ids list.
71-82: LGTM! Clean DTO conversion and response creation.The conversion from model to DTO and wrapping in
CreateTeamResponseis properly implemented.todo/views/team.py (3)
35-51: Refactor unconventional error handling pattern.The current implementation wraps
ApiErrorResponseinsideValueError, which is an anti-pattern. Custom exceptions should be raised directly for better code clarity and maintainability.Consider creating a custom exception class and raising it directly:
- except ValueError as e: - if isinstance(e.args[0], ApiErrorResponse): - error_response = e.args[0] - return Response( - data=error_response.model_dump(mode="json"), - status=error_response.statusCode - ) - - fallback_response = ApiErrorResponse( - statusCode=500, - message=ApiErrors.UNEXPECTED_ERROR_OCCURRED, - errors=[{"detail": str(e) if settings.DEBUG else ApiErrors.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR}], - ) - return Response( - data=fallback_response.model_dump(mode="json"), - status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR - ) + except ApiException as e: + return Response( + data=e.error_response.model_dump(mode="json"), + status=e.error_response.statusCode + ) + except Exception as e: + fallback_response = ApiErrorResponse( + statusCode=500, + message=ApiErrors.UNEXPECTED_ERROR_OCCURRED, + errors=[{"detail": str(e) if settings.DEBUG else ApiErrors.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR}], + ) + return Response( + data=fallback_response.model_dump(mode="json"), + status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR + )You'll need to define a custom exception class:
class ApiException(Exception): def __init__(self, error_response: ApiErrorResponse): self.error_response = error_response super().__init__(str(error_response))⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52 File: todo/views/task.py:98-112 Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52 File: todo/views/task.py:98-112 Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z Learning: In the todo-backend project, there is a global exception handler in `todo/exceptions/exception_handler.py` that handles exceptions globally, eliminating the need for try-catch blocks in individual view methods. This approach reduces boilerplate code and provides consistent error handling across the application.
35-51: Simplify error handling pattern.The current error handling pattern of catching ValueError and checking if it contains an ApiErrorResponse is complex. Consider using custom exceptions for better clarity.
except ValueError as e: - if isinstance(e.args[0], ApiErrorResponse): - error_response = e.args[0] - return Response( - data=error_response.model_dump(mode="json"), - status=error_response.statusCode - ) + # Handle service-specific errors + if hasattr(e, 'error_response'): + error_response = e.error_response + return Response( + data=error_response.model_dump(mode="json"), + status=error_response.statusCode + ) fallback_response = ApiErrorResponse( statusCode=500, message=ApiErrors.UNEXPECTED_ERROR_OCCURRED, - errors=[{"detail": str(e) if settings.DEBUG else ApiErrors.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR}], + errors=[{"detail": str(e) if settings.DEBUG else ApiErrors.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR}], ) return Response( - data=fallback_response.model_dump(mode="json"), + data=fallback_response.model_dump(mode="json"), status=status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR )⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52 File: todo/views/task.py:98-112 Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z Learning: The todo-backend project uses a global exception handler that automatically handles TaskNotFoundException, BsonInvalidId, ValueError with ApiErrorResponse, and DRFValidationError. Views should avoid try-catch blocks and let exceptions bubble up to the global handler for consistent error formatting and status codes.Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52 File: todo/views/task.py:98-112 Timestamp: 2025-06-02T17:02:22.424Z Learning: In the todo-backend project, there is a global exception handler in `todo/exceptions/exception_handler.py` that handles exceptions globally, eliminating the need for try-catch blocks in individual view methods. This approach reduces boilerplate code and provides consistent error handling across the application.
27-27: No action needed:request.user_idis set by JWTAuthenticationMiddlewareThe JWTAuthenticationMiddleware in
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.pyreliably assignsrequest.user_idfor both Google (payload["user_id"]) and RDS (payload["userId"]) authentication flows, and it’s included in theMIDDLEWARElist intodo_project/settings/base.py. The original concern can be safely dismissed.todo/tests/unit/views/test_auth.py (1)
1-249: Test updates look good!The test changes appropriately reflect the updated authentication flow:
- Callback now uses GET and returns redirects with error parameters
- Refresh token endpoint tests removed to match implementation
- New tests for session and cookie clearing on logout
todo/views/auth.py (1)
200-236: Logout implementation looks good!The logout flow properly:
- Flushes the session to clear all session data
- Returns a consistent JSON response
- Clears authentication and session cookies with proper domain/path settings
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
| Category | Issue | Status |
|---|---|---|
 |
Missing Error Message Handling ▹ view | |
 |
Sensitive Information Exposure in Error Messages ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
 |
Missing POC ID Validation ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
|
Missing Member IDs Validation ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
 |
Missing URL Pattern Organization ▹ view | |
|
Unconstrained Role ID ▹ view | |
 |
Non-Pythonic Collection Name ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
|
Missing User ID Validation ▹ view | |
|
Missing Team Name Validation ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
|
Mutable Default Argument List ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py | ✅ |
| todo/dto/team_dto.py | ✅ |
| todo/serializers/create_team_serializer.py | ✅ |
| todo/urls.py | ✅ |
| todo/models/team.py | ✅ |
| todo/repositories/team_repository.py | ✅ |
| todo/views/team.py | ✅ |
| todo/services/team_service.py | ✅ |
| todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py | ✅ |
| todo_project/settings/base.py | ✅ |
| todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py | ✅ |
| todo/views/auth.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
| Category | Issue | Status |
|---|---|---|
|
Inconsistent ID Type Comparison ▹ view | |
|
Loss of Exception Context ▹ view | |
|
Unclear Abbreviation in Variable Name ▹ view | |
 |
Missing Response Model Documentation ▹ view | |
|
Missing critical field context in serializer ▹ view | |
|
Missing Field Context in Validation Error ▹ view | |
|
Missing POC ID Validation ▹ view | |
|
Duplicate ObjectId Validation Logic ▹ view | |
|
Insecure Role Assignment Using Hardcoded Values ▹ view | |
|
Insufficient method documentation ▹ view |
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| todo/dto/responses/create_team_response.py | ✅ |
| todo/serializers/create_team_serializer.py | ✅ |
| todo/urls.py | ✅ |
| todo/dto/team_dto.py | ✅ |
| todo/models/team.py | ✅ |
| todo/constants/messages.py | ✅ |
| todo/repositories/team_repository.py | ✅ |
| todo/views/team.py | ✅ |
| todo/services/team_service.py | ✅ |
| todo_project/settings/base.py | ✅ |
| todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py | ✅ |
| todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py | ✅ |
| todo/views/auth.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
| name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100) | ||
| description = serializers.CharField(max_length=500, required=False, allow_blank=True) | ||
| member_ids = serializers.ListField(child=serializers.CharField(), required=False, default=list) | ||
| poc_id = serializers.CharField(required=True, allow_null=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unclear Abbreviation in Variable Name 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The variable name 'poc_id' uses an unclear abbreviation that may not be immediately understood by all developers.
Why this matters
Using abbreviations in code reduces readability and requires developers to context switch or search for the meaning, slowing down code comprehension.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
point_of_contact_id = serializers.CharField(required=True, allow_null=False)Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| user_teams.append(poc_user_team) | ||
|
|
||
| # Add creator if not already in member_ids | ||
| if created_by_user_id not in member_ids: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent ID Type Comparison 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The code compares a string (created_by_user_id) with a list of strings (member_ids) directly, but earlier in the code PyObjectId is used for user IDs.
Why this matters
This comparison will always evaluate to True since string and PyObjectId types never match, causing the creator to be added as a duplicate team member.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Convert created_by_user_id to str for comparison with member_ids:
if str(created_by_user_id) not in member_ids:Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| except Exception as e: | ||
| raise ValueError(str(e)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Loss of Exception Context 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The exception handling wraps all exceptions into ValueError, losing the original exception type and stack trace.
Why this matters
This makes debugging harder and masks important error information that could help identify the root cause of failures in team creation.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Either handle specific exceptions or re-raise the original exception:
except Exception as e:
raise # This preserves the original exception and stack traceProvide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| class CreateTeamResponse(BaseModel): | ||
| team: TeamDTO | ||
| message: str |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing Response Model Documentation 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The response model lacks documentation explaining its purpose and the meaning of its fields.
Why this matters
Without clear documentation, developers integrating with this API response model will have to review implementation code to understand what values to expect in each field.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
class CreateTeamResponse(BaseModel):
"""Response model for team creation endpoint.
Attributes:
team: The newly created team details
message: Success or status message from the operation
"""
team: TeamDTO
message: strProvide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| class CreateTeamSerializer(serializers.Serializer): | ||
| name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100) | ||
| description = serializers.CharField(max_length=500, required=False, allow_blank=True) | ||
| member_ids = serializers.ListField(child=serializers.CharField(), required=False, default=list) | ||
| poc_id = serializers.CharField(required=True, allow_null=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing critical field context in serializer
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The serializer class lacks a docstring explaining its purpose and the significance of the poc_id field which appears to be a critical required field.
Why this matters
Without understanding what poc_id represents, future maintainers might incorrectly modify its requirements or misuse the serializer.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
class CreateTeamSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
"""Serializer for team creation with a required point of contact.
The poc_id represents the team's point of contact and must be provided.
"""
name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
description = serializers.CharField(max_length=500, required=False, allow_blank=True)
member_ids = serializers.ListField(child=serializers.CharField(), required=False, default=list)
poc_id = serializers.CharField(required=True, allow_null=False) # Point of Contact ID
Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| if v is None: | ||
| raise ValueError("User ID cannot be None") | ||
| if not PyObjectId.is_valid(v): | ||
| raise ValueError(f"Invalid user ID format: {v}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing Field Context in Validation Error
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Error messages in the TeamModel validator lack context about which field failed validation
Why this matters
When validation fails, the generic error message makes it harder to identify whether it was created_by or updated_by that caused the failure during debugging
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
@validator("created_by", "updated_by")
def validate_user_id(cls, v, field):
if v is None:
raise ValueError(f"{field.name} cannot be None")
if not PyObjectId.is_valid(v):
raise ValueError(f"Invalid {field.name} format: {v}")
return vProvide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
|
|
||
| name: str = Field(..., min_length=1, max_length=100) | ||
| description: str | None = None | ||
| poc_id: PyObjectId |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing POC ID Validation
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The poc_id field in TeamModel lacks validation unlike other ObjectId fields.
Why this matters
Invalid poc_id values could be accepted, potentially causing runtime errors when interacting with the database.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Add poc_id to the validator decorator in TeamModel:
@validator("created_by", "updated_by", "poc_id")
def validate_user_id(cls, v):
"""Validate that the user ID is a valid ObjectId format."""
if v is None:
raise ValueError("User ID cannot be None")
if not PyObjectId.is_valid(v):
raise ValueError(f"Invalid user ID format: {v}")
return vProvide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| @validator("created_by", "updated_by") | ||
| def validate_user_id(cls, v): | ||
| """Validate that the user ID is a valid ObjectId format.""" | ||
| if v is None: | ||
| raise ValueError("User ID cannot be None") | ||
| if not PyObjectId.is_valid(v): | ||
| raise ValueError(f"Invalid user ID format: {v}") | ||
| return v |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Duplicate ObjectId Validation Logic 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Duplicate validation logic between TeamModel.validate_user_id and UserTeamDetailsModel.validate_object_ids for ObjectId fields.
Why this matters
Code duplication increases maintenance burden and risk of inconsistencies when changes are needed to the validation logic.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Extract the common validation logic into a shared mixin class or utility function:
class ObjectIdValidatorMixin:
@classmethod
def validate_object_id(cls, v, field_name="ObjectId"):
if v is None:
raise ValueError(f"{field_name} cannot be None")
if not PyObjectId.is_valid(v):
raise ValueError(f"Invalid {field_name} format: {v}")
return v
class TeamModel(Document, ObjectIdValidatorMixin):
@validator("created_by", "updated_by")
def validate_user_id(cls, v):
return cls.validate_object_id(v, "User ID")Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| user_team = UserTeamDetailsModel( | ||
| user_id=PyObjectId(user_id), | ||
| team_id=created_team.id, | ||
| role_id="1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Insecure Role Assignment Using Hardcoded Values 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Hardcoded role IDs ('1' and '2') are used to assign user roles in teams without validation or constant definitions.
Why this matters
Using magic string values for role assignments could lead to authorization vulnerabilities if these values are mistyped or if the role system changes. An attacker could potentially gain elevated privileges if role IDs are not properly validated.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Define role IDs as validated enums or constants, and add role validation:
from enum import Enum
class TeamRoles(Enum):
MEMBER = "1"
POC = "2"
# Then use:
role_id=TeamRoles.MEMBER.value
role_id=TeamRoles.POC.valueProvide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| @classmethod | ||
| def create_team(cls, dto: CreateTeamDTO, created_by_user_id: str) -> CreateTeamResponse: | ||
| """ | ||
| Create a new team with members and POC. | ||
| """ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Insufficient method documentation
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The docstring only repeats what the method name already conveys and lacks critical information about parameters, return value, and key business logic decisions.
Why this matters
Missing information about parameters and behavior makes it harder for other developers to understand important aspects like automatic team member additions and role assignments.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
"""
Creates a team and establishes member relationships with role assignments.
A team will always include:
- The creator (role_id=1) if not in member_ids
- The POC (role_id=2) if specified and not in member_ids
- All specified member_ids (role_id=1)
Args:
dto: Team creation data including name, description, POC, and members
created_by_user_id: ID of the user creating the team
Returns:
CreateTeamResponse with the created team details and success message
Raises:
ValueError: If team creation fails
"""
Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
lakshayman
force-pushed
the
feat/create-teams
branch
from
0e652b7 to
28cb7d5
Compare
Date:
Developer Name:
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add functionality to create and manage teams in Todo application, including models, DTOs, repositories, services, serializers, and views.
Why are these changes being made?
These changes introduce team management capabilities, addressing the need for teams to have members and a Point of Contact (POC), supporting collaborative functionalities. The approach ensures validation of IDs and structured error handling, extending the existing application architecture while adhering to security practices, such as JWT handling and validation.