fix: resolve label validation errors in create task endpoint #183
Conversation
- Fix ObjectId type conversion for label validation - Handle system-created labels without database user lookup - Maintain read-only system label design
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe changes update the logic for handling user references in label DTOs, specifically treating the "system" user as a special case. Additionally, label IDs are now consistently converted to Changes
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this unicorn.
/
,.. /
,' ';
,,.__ _,' /'; .
:',' ~~~~ '. '~
:' ( ) )::,
'. '. .=----=..-~ .;'
' ;' :: ':. '"
(: ': ;)
\\ '" ./
'" '"Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| todo/services/task_service.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
…t/PATCH-API-endpoint ncnnc
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
todo/services/task_service.py(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
todo/services/task_service.py (4)
Learnt from: shobhan-sundar-goutam
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#95
File: todo/services/label_service.py:86-91
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T18:44:05.550Z
Learning: In the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend project, the GET v1/labels endpoint is designed to return only three fields in the response: id, name, and color. The prepare_label_dto method in todo/services/label_service.py intentionally excludes other LabelDTO fields like createdAt, updatedAt, createdBy, and updatedBy from the API response.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 tracks the implementation of user authentication in the todo-backend project, which includes extracting user ID from request context to replace hardcoded placeholders like "system_patch_user" in todo/views/task.py.
Learnt from: Achintya-Chatterjee
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#52
File: todo/views/task.py:106-106
Timestamp: 2025-05-29T21:36:27.694Z
Learning: Issue #26 in the Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend repository comprehensively tracks user authentication implementation including registration, login, JWT tokens, and making task APIs require authentication. This covers replacing hardcoded user ID placeholders like "system_patch_user" with actual user ID extraction from authenticated requests.
Learnt from: AnujChhikara
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-backend#119
File: todo/repositories/task_repository.py:149-154
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T19:59:31.694Z
Learning: In the todo-backend project, per product requirements, tasks marked as deleted (isDeleted=True) should still be returned in user task queries. The get_tasks_for_user method in TaskRepository should not filter out deleted tasks, unlike typical soft deletion patterns.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
todo/services/task_service.py (5)
todo/dto/user_dto.py (1)
UserDTO(6-10)todo/dto/label_dto.py (1)
LabelDTO(7-14)todo/models/common/pyobjectid.py (1)
PyObjectId(4-15)todo/repositories/label_repository.py (2)
LabelRepository(9-54)list_by_ids(13-18)todo/models/task.py (1)
TaskModel(23-43)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
todo/services/task_service.py (3)
172-177: Good implementation for handling system user labels.The helper function correctly handles the special case for "system" user IDs by returning a fixed UserDTO without database lookup, which aligns with the PR objective of managing system-created labels.
185-186: Consistent application of the system user handling.The helper function is properly applied to both
createdByandupdatedByfields, ensuring consistent handling of system user references across all label DTOs.
428-428: Correct assignment of converted labels.The task model now receives properly converted
PyObjectIdobjects instead of string IDs, which should resolve the label validation errors mentioned in the PR objectives.
Date:
July 18, 2025Developer Name: @Achintya-Chatterjee
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Convert string label IDs to ObjectId format and handle system user labels
to enable task creation with predefined system labels.
Fix ObjectId type conversion for label validation
Handle system-created labels without database user lookup
Maintain read-only system label design
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Screen.Recording.2025-07-18.at.04.34.12.mov
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Introduce validation for label handling in the
create_taskendpoint by converting label IDs toPyObjectIdand adjusting how user DTOs are prepared for system and non-system users.Why are these changes being made?
These changes address label validation errors that occurred due to incorrect handling of label IDs and user information in the task creation process. By converting label IDs to
PyObjectIdand refining user DTO preparation, the code ensures that labels are validated and associated correctly, while also handling cases where users are system accounts.