test: adds test cases for authentication #83
Conversation
* fix: add auth to pass tests * tests: auth * lint and format * add test creds in test.yml for testing purpose * auth view tests * wip * fix tests based on latest pull of test containers * fixed tests based on updated response structure * rebased on updated auth and fixed tests
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis update introduces comprehensive unit and integration tests for authentication and user management, including Google OAuth and RDS authentication. It refactors error response formatting in the JWT authentication middleware and authentication views for consistency. The test infrastructure is enhanced with authenticated test base classes and fixtures, and error message assertions are updated to match revised API responses. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant APIClient
participant JWTAuthMiddleware
participant GoogleOAuthService
participant UserRepository
participant TaskAPI
User->>APIClient: Sends request to protected endpoint
APIClient->>JWTAuthMiddleware: Forwards request
alt Valid Google or RDS Token
JWTAuthMiddleware->>UserRepository: Validate user/token
UserRepository-->>JWTAuthMiddleware: User details
JWTAuthMiddleware->>TaskAPI: Pass authenticated request
TaskAPI-->>User: Returns data
else Invalid or Missing Token
JWTAuthMiddleware-->>User: Returns 401 Unauthorized with error response
end
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changesNo out-of-scope changes found. Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this squirrel.
_.-"""-,
.' ..::. `\
/ .::' `'` /
/ .::' .--.=;
| ::' / C ..\
| :: | \ _.)
\ ':| / \
'-, \./ \)\)
`-| );/
'--'-'Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py | ✅ |
| todo/views/auth.py | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
🔭 Outside diff range comments (5)
todo/views/auth.py (2)
375-379: Cookie deletion omits domain / samesite – cookies may survive logout
set_cookie()uses the configured domain, samesite and secure flags, but the matchingdelete_cookie()calls only specifypath="/".
IfCOOKIE_DOMAIN(or other attributes) is set, browsers will keep the cookies, resulting in a silent auth cache.- response.delete_cookie("ext-access", path="/") - response.delete_cookie("ext-refresh", path="/") - response.delete_cookie(settings.SESSION_COOKIE_NAME, path="/") + cookie_cfg = self._get_cookie_config() + response.delete_cookie("ext-access", **cookie_cfg) + response.delete_cookie("ext-refresh", **cookie_cfg) + response.delete_cookie(settings.SESSION_COOKIE_NAME, **cookie_cfg)
150-158: Repeated_get_cookie_config()logic – consider centralisingThe same helper appears three times across the view classes. A small utility (e.g.
todo.utils.cookie_utils.get_google_cookie_config()) would remove duplication and ensure future tweaks (like SameSite changes) are applied consistently.Also applies to: 338-344, 382-389
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py (2)
77-96: Order-sensitive loop can cause flaky assertion
zip(response_data["errors"], expected_response["errors"])assumes the API returns errors in a specific order. If validation order changes the test will fail while the API is still correct.Prefer set-based or mapping comparison:
- for actual_error, expected_error in zip(response_data["errors"], expected_response["errors"]): - self.assertEqual(actual_error["source"]["parameter"], expected_error["source"]["parameter"]) - self.assertEqual(actual_error["detail"], expected_error["detail"]) + self.assertCountEqual( + [e["source"]["parameter"] for e in response_data["errors"]], + [e["source"]["parameter"] for e in expected_response["errors"]], + ) + self.assertCountEqual( + [e["detail"] for e in response_data["errors"]], + [e["detail"] for e in expected_response["errors"]], + )
316-324:try/excepthides real failures – test will pass even if the view crashesCatching a broad
Exceptioninside the test means an unexpected server error is treated as success.- try: - response = self.client.post(self.url, data=self.valid_payload, format="json") - self.assertEqual(response.status_code, status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) - self.assertEqual(response.data["message"], ApiErrors.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) - except Exception as e: - self.assertEqual(str(e), "Database exploded") + response = self.client.post(self.url, data=self.valid_payload, format="json") + self.assertEqual(response.status_code, status.HTTP_500_INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR) + self.assertEqual(response.data["message"], ApiErrors.INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR)If the view really raises an unhandled exception Django’s test client will propagate it and the test will naturally fail, which is what we want.
todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py (1)
67-88: Consider parametrising withpytestfor brevityThe
unittestsubTest loop is fine, but converting the suite topytestwith@pytest.mark.parametrizewould make the intent shorter and clearer.
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py (2)
118-136: …and in the specialised handlers
Both private handlers repeat the single-error list pattern. Once the helper exists, these become:return self._json_unauthorized(str(exception))
52-60: Reuse the helper suggested above here as well
Same structure / same comments as previous block.todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py (1)
45-52: Assertion should target the repository instanceSame instance-vs-class issue as above.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
.github/workflows/test.yml(2 hunks)todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py(3 hunks)todo/tests/fixtures/user.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_task_detail_api.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/exceptions/test_exception_handler.py(2 hunks)todo/tests/unit/middlewares/__init__.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/models/test_user.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/services/test_google_oauth_service.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/views/test_auth.py(1 hunks)todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py(8 hunks)todo/views/auth.py(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py (2)
todo/dto/responses/error_response.py (2)
ApiErrorDetail(13-16)ApiErrorResponse(19-23)todo/constants/messages.py (2)
ApiErrors(19-42)AuthErrorMessages(63-75)
todo/tests/unit/models/test_user.py (1)
todo/models/user.py (1)
UserModel(8-20)
todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py (5)
todo/repositories/user_repository.py (2)
UserRepository(12-56)create_or_update(28-56)todo/models/user.py (1)
UserModel(8-20)todo/models/common/pyobjectid.py (1)
PyObjectId(4-15)todo/exceptions/google_auth_exceptions.py (2)
GoogleUserNotFoundException(40-42)GoogleAPIException(35-37)todo/constants/messages.py (1)
RepositoryErrors(10-15)
todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py (2)
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py (4)
JWTAuthenticationMiddleware(13-136)is_google_user(139-140)is_rds_user(143-144)get_current_user_info(147-172)todo/constants/messages.py (1)
AuthErrorMessages(63-75)
todo/views/auth.py (1)
todo/constants/messages.py (1)
AppMessages(2-6)
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py (4)
todo/utils/google_jwt_utils.py (1)
generate_google_token_pair(101-110)todo/tests/integration/test_task_detail_api.py (3)
setUp(12-14)setUp(29-37)_setup_auth_cookies(16-25)todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py (3)
setUp(12-14)setUp(29-37)_setup_auth_cookies(16-25)todo/constants/messages.py (1)
ApiErrors(19-42)
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
.github/workflows/test.yml
[LOW] 15-16: Base64 High Entropy String
(CKV_SECRET_6)
🪛 actionlint (1.7.7)
.github/workflows/test.yml
32-32: key "python-version" is duplicated in "with" section. previously defined at line:31,col:11. note that this key is case insensitive
(syntax-check)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/test.yml
[error] 32-32: duplication of key "python-version" in mapping
(key-duplicates)
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
todo/tests/unit/services/test_user_service.py
[convention] 14-14: Line too long (114/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 42-42: Line too long (114/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'rest_framework.exceptions'
(E0401)
[convention] 12-12: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 18-18: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 27-27: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 37-37: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 45-45: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 54-54: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 61-61: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 63-63: Access to a protected member _validate_google_user_data of a client class
(W0212)
[convention] 67-67: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 77-77: Access to a protected member _validate_google_user_data of a client class
(W0212)
todo/tests/fixtures/user.py
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
todo/middlewares/jwt_auth.py
[convention] 41-41: Line too long (119/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 60-60: Line too long (115/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 122-122: Line too long (109/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 125-125: Line too long (111/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 132-132: Line too long (109/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 135-135: Line too long (111/100)
(C0301)
todo/tests/integration/test_task_detail_api.py
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'bson'
(E0401)
[convention] 11-11: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 28-28: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
todo/tests/unit/models/test_user.py
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'pydantic_core._pydantic_core'
(E0401)
[convention] 8-8: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 12-12: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 21-21: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 35-35: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 45-45: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
todo/tests/integration/test_tasks_delete.py
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'bson'
(E0401)
[convention] 11-11: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 28-28: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
todo/tests/unit/services/test_google_oauth_service.py
[convention] 21-21: Line too long (104/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 128-128: Line too long (103/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[convention] 10-10: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 25-25: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 45-45: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 55-55: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 68-68: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 77-77: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 84-84: Access to a protected member _exchange_code_for_tokens of a client class
(W0212)
[convention] 95-95: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 102-102: Access to a protected member _exchange_code_for_tokens of a client class
(W0212)
[convention] 106-106: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 112-112: Access to a protected member _get_user_info of a client class
(W0212)
[convention] 120-120: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 127-127: Access to a protected member _get_user_info of a client class
(W0212)
[convention] 131-131: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[warning] 137-137: Access to a protected member _get_user_info of a client class
(W0212)
todo/tests/unit/repositories/test_user_repository.py
[convention] 15-15: Line too long (107/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 80-80: Line too long (114/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'bson'
(E0401)
[convention] 13-13: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 22-22: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 34-34: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 43-43: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 52-52: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 65-65: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 74-74: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 83-83: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
todo/tests/unit/middlewares/test_jwt_auth.py
[convention] 8-8: Line too long (117/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'django.http'
(E0401)
[error] 4-4: Unable to import 'django.conf'
(E0401)
[error] 5-5: Unable to import 'rest_framework'
(E0401)
[convention] 12-12: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 77-77: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 6-6: standard import "json" should be placed before third party imports "django.http.HttpRequest", "django.conf.settings", "rest_framework.status"
(C0411)
todo/views/auth.py
[convention] 105-105: Line too long (106/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 325-325: Line too long (117/100)
(C0301)
todo/tests/unit/views/test_auth.py
[convention] 87-87: Line too long (108/100)
(C0301)
[convention] 1-1: Missing module docstring
(C0114)
[error] 1-1: Unable to import 'rest_framework.test'
(E0401)
[error] 2-2: Unable to import 'rest_framework.reverse'
(E0401)
[error] 3-3: Unable to import 'rest_framework'
(E0401)
[error] 5-5: Unable to import 'bson.objectid'
(E0401)
[convention] 17-17: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 18-18: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 18-18: Method name "setUp" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style
(C0103)
[convention] 24-24: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 36-36: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 49-49: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 62-62: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 63-63: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 63-63: Method name "setUp" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style
(C0103)
[convention] 70-70: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 80-80: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 89-89: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 101-101: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 134-134: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 135-135: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 135-135: Method name "setUp" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style
(C0103)
[convention] 140-140: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 150-150: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 181-181: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 182-182: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 182-182: Method name "setUp" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style
(C0103)
[convention] 187-187: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 196-196: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 216-216: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 217-217: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 217-217: Method name "setUp" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style
(C0103)
[convention] 222-222: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 241-241: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 253-253: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 4-4: standard import "unittest.mock.patch" should be placed before third party imports "rest_framework.test.APISimpleTestCase", "rest_framework.reverse.reverse", "rest_framework.status"
(C0411)
todo/tests/unit/views/test_task.py
[convention] 26-26: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 27-27: Missing function or method docstring
(C0116)
[convention] 27-27: Method name "setUp" doesn't conform to snake_case naming style
(C0103)
[refactor] 26-26: Too few public methods (1/2)
(R0903)
[convention] 45-45: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 23-23: Imports from package todo are not grouped
(C0412)
[convention] 216-216: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[warning] 323-323: Catching too general exception Exception
(W0718)
[convention] 327-327: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
[convention] 357-357: Missing class docstring
(C0115)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
todo/tests/unit/middlewares/__init__.py (1)
1-1: Package marker looks good
Adding an empty__init__.pyis the correct minimal change for test discovery.todo/tests/integration/test_task_detail_api.py (1)
3-3: Ensurebsonis available in CI
actionlintflagged the import. Verify thatpymongo(which providesbson) is pinned inrequirements.txt; otherwise tests will error in the workflow.
yesyash
changed the title
| self.request.headers = {} | ||
| self.request.COOKIES = {} | ||
| self._original_public_paths = settings.PUBLIC_PATHS | ||
| settings.PUBLIC_PATHS = ["/v1/auth/google/login"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This works, but the best practice is to use Django's reverse() utility. Hardcoding URL paths makes our tests brittle. If we ever decide to refactor our API routes (e.g., change /v1/ to /v2/), we would have to manually find and replace these strings in every single test file, which is error-prone.
|
as github is down, I am merging this PR |
| def test_user_model_instantiates_with_valid_data(self): | ||
| user = UserModel(**self.valid_user_data) | ||
|
|
||
| self.assertEqual(user.google_id, self.valid_user_data["google_id"]) | ||
| self.assertEqual(user.email_id, self.valid_user_data["email_id"]) | ||
| self.assertEqual(user.name, self.valid_user_data["name"]) | ||
| self.assertEqual(user.created_at, self.valid_user_data["created_at"]) | ||
| self.assertEqual(user.updated_at, self.valid_user_data["updated_at"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- I don't think we need to check class instantiation here. When we use the methods or properties of the class, we will know if the value was set correctly or not. Please make this change in the next pr.
| def test_user_model_sets_default_timestamps(self): | ||
| minimal_data = { | ||
| "google_id": self.valid_user_data["google_id"], | ||
| "email_id": self.valid_user_data["email_id"], | ||
| "name": self.valid_user_data["name"], | ||
| } | ||
| user = UserModel(**minimal_data) | ||
|
|
||
| self.assertIsInstance(user.created_at, datetime) | ||
| self.assertIsNone(user.updated_at) | ||
| self.assertLessEqual(user.created_at, datetime.now(timezone.utc)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- i do not think we need to write test for default time stamp, please make this change in the next pr.
|
|
||
| class UserRepositoryTests(TestCase): | ||
| def setUp(self) -> None: | ||
| self.valid_user_data = {"google_id": "123456789", "email": "[email protected]", "name": "Test User"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- let's get user data from
users_db_datalike we're doing inmodels/test_user.py.
self.valid_user_data = users_db_data[0]| @patch("todo.repositories.user_repository.DatabaseManager") | ||
| def test_get_by_id_database_error(self, mock_db_manager): | ||
| mock_db_manager.return_value = self.mock_db_manager | ||
| user_id = str(ObjectId()) | ||
| self.mock_collection.find_one.side_effect = Exception("Database error") | ||
|
|
||
| with self.assertRaises(GoogleUserNotFoundException): | ||
| UserRepository.get_by_id(user_id) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- as discussed we do not need to check this, as when getting a user by id there can be two cases, either we get the user or we do not and we are checking for both above.
| @patch("todo.repositories.user_repository.DatabaseManager") | ||
| def test_create_or_update_database_error(self, mock_db_manager): | ||
| mock_db_manager.return_value = self.mock_db_manager | ||
| self.mock_collection.find_one_and_update.side_effect = Exception("Database error") | ||
|
|
||
| with self.assertRaises(GoogleAPIException) as context: | ||
| UserRepository.create_or_update(self.valid_user_data) | ||
| self.assertIn(RepositoryErrors.USER_CREATE_UPDATE_FAILED.format("Database error"), str(context.exception)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- same as above, please remove this.
| @patch("todo.repositories.user_repository.DatabaseManager") | ||
| def test_create_or_update_sets_timestamps(self, mock_db_manager): | ||
| mock_db_manager.return_value = self.mock_db_manager | ||
| self.mock_collection.find_one_and_update.return_value = users_db_data[0] | ||
|
|
||
| UserRepository.create_or_update(self.valid_user_data) | ||
|
|
||
| call_args = self.mock_collection.find_one_and_update.call_args[0] | ||
| update_doc = call_args[1] | ||
| self.assertIn("$set", update_doc) | ||
| self.assertIn("updated_at", update_doc["$set"]) | ||
| self.assertIn("$setOnInsert", update_doc) | ||
| self.assertIn("created_at", update_doc["$setOnInsert"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- we can move the logic to check
updated_atin thetest_create_or_update_successtest case.
| "SCOPES": ["email", "profile"], | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| self.valid_user_info = {"id": "123456789", "email": "[email protected]", "name": "Test User"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- should we pick this from fixtures?
| @patch("todo.services.google_oauth_service.requests.get") | ||
| def test_get_user_info_missing_fields(self, mock_get): | ||
| mock_response = MagicMock() | ||
| mock_response.status_code = 200 | ||
| mock_response.json.return_value = {"id": "123"} | ||
| mock_get.return_value = mock_response | ||
|
|
||
| with self.assertRaises(GoogleAPIException) as context: | ||
| GoogleOAuthService._get_user_info("test-token") | ||
| error_msg = str(context.exception) | ||
| self.assertIn(ApiErrors.MISSING_USER_INFO_FIELDS.split(":")[0], error_msg) | ||
| for field in ("email", "name"): | ||
| self.assertIn(field, error_msg) |
| self.mock_settings = { | ||
| "GOOGLE_OAUTH": { | ||
| "CLIENT_ID": "test-client-id", | ||
| "CLIENT_SECRET": "test-client-secret", | ||
| "REDIRECT_URI": "http://localhost:3000/auth/callback", | ||
| "SCOPES": ["email", "profile"], | ||
| } | ||
| } |
|
|
||
| class UserServiceTests(TestCase): | ||
| def setUp(self) -> None: | ||
| self.valid_google_user_data = {"google_id": "123456789", "email": "[email protected]", "name": "Test User"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- please pick this from fixtures.
|
@VaibhavSingh8 please address the comments above in the next pr, also add a issue ticket for the next pr you will be raising here. |
|
@yesyash @Achintya-Chatterjee , addressed your comments in this PR #90 . Please review. |
Date: 17-Jun-2025
Developer Name: @VaibhavSingh8
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Tests for Authentication, missed in previous PR merged to develop
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add comprehensive support and testing for Google OAuth authentication in the Todo app.
Why are these changes being made?
These changes implement and ensure that OAuth-based authentication flows function correctly within the application, improve the middleware handling of JWTs, and include extensive tests to validate Google authentication processes, thereby enhancing the app's security and user reliability.