test/ unit tests for update impersonation request#2447
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThree new unit test suites have been added for the impersonation requests feature. These tests cover the middleware validator, the model's update logic, and the service layer functions, ensuring validation, update operations, and error handling are correctly implemented for the impersonation request workflow. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Middleware
participant Service
participant Model
participant DB
User->>Middleware: Send update impersonation request
Middleware->>Service: Validate update request
Service->>Model: Fetch impersonation request
Model->>DB: Query/update impersonation request
DB-->>Model: Return result
Model-->>Service: Return update result
Service-->>Middleware: Return response or error
Middleware-->>User: Respond with success or error
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts(1 hunks)test/unit/models/impersonationRequests.test.ts(1 hunks)test/unit/services/impersonationRequests.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: Suvidh-kaushik
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/website-backend#2443
File: test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts:12-19
Timestamp: 2025-06-19T17:06:24.352Z
Learning: In test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts, the developer uses `any` type for req and res mock objects to enable reusability across different middleware tests (get, update, create) in the same file, as strict typing causes test failures when different middleware functions expect different request/response shapes.
🪛 GitHub Check: build (22.10.0)
test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts
[failure] 8-8:
'"../../../types/impersonationRequest"' has no exported member named 'UpdateImpersonationRequest'. Did you mean 'ImpersonationRequest'?
[failure] 5-5:
Cannot find module '../../../middlewares/validators/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
test/unit/services/impersonationRequests.test.ts
[failure] 23-23:
Cannot find module '../../../models/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
[failure] 22-22:
Cannot find module '../../fixtures/impersonation-requests/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
[failure] 4-4:
Cannot find module '../../../models/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
[failure] 3-3:
Cannot find module '../../../services/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
test/unit/models/impersonationRequests.test.ts
[failure] 8-8:
Cannot find module '../../fixtures/impersonation-requests/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
[failure] 3-3:
Cannot find module '../../../models/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests
test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts
[error] 5-5: TypeScript error TS2307: Cannot find module '../../../middlewares/validators/impersonationRequests' or its corresponding type declarations.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/unit/middlewares/impersonationRequests.test.ts (1)
1-78: LGTM! Well-structured middleware validation tests.The test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the
updateImpersonationRequestValidatormiddleware with proper mocking, validation scenarios, and error handling. The structure follows good testing practices with appropriate setup/teardown and clear test cases for valid requests, missing status field, and invalid status values.Note: The import failures in static analysis are expected as mentioned in the PR objectives, since this test PR depends on feature PR #2446 being merged first.
test/unit/models/impersonationRequests.test.ts (1)
1-109: Excellent comprehensive model testing with thorough error handling.This test suite provides outstanding coverage of the
updateImpersonationRequestmodel function:
- Database operations: Tests approval/rejection status updates
- Timing fields: Verifies
startedAt,endedAt, andisImpersonationFinishedupdates- Timestamp tracking: Ensures
updatedAtis properly maintained- Error handling: Excellent Firestore failure simulation with proper stubbing and logging verification
The test structure follows best practices with proper database cleanup, realistic fixtures, and comprehensive scenario coverage.
Note: The import failures in static analysis are expected as mentioned in the PR objectives.
test/unit/services/impersonationRequests.test.ts (2)
27-208: Comprehensive service layer testing with excellent coverage.This test suite provides thorough coverage of the impersonation request service functions:
Validation Service Tests:
- NotFound error when request doesn't exist
- Forbidden errors for already approved/rejected requests
- Authorization checks for unauthorized users
- Valid scenario verification
Update Service Tests:
- Successful approval/rejection operations
- Proper response structure validation
- Error handling with logging verification
The test structure is well-organized with proper setup/teardown and realistic test scenarios. The stubbing patterns effectively isolate the service layer logic.
Note: The import failures in static analysis are expected as mentioned in the PR objectives.
202-202: Fix assertion syntax.The assertion is missing the
bekeyword.- expect(loggerStub.calledWith(ERROR_WHILE_CREATING_REQUEST, err)).to.true; + expect(loggerStub.calledWith(ERROR_WHILE_CREATING_REQUEST, err)).to.be.true;Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
…ackend into test/unit_tests_for_update_impersonation_requests
…ackend into test/unit_tests_for_update_impersonation_requests
Suvidh-kaushik
force-pushed
the
test/unit_tests_for_update_impersonation_requests
branch
from
c4859d7 to
40d542d
Compare
Suvidh-kaushik
force-pushed
the
test/unit_tests_for_update_impersonation_requests
branch
from
edfa191 to
e91942b
Compare
…ackend into test/unit_tests_for_update_impersonation_requests
3 participants
Date: 21/06/2025
Developer Name: Suvidh Kaushik
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
N/A
Test Coverage
Screenshots
ValidatorService
Model
Additional Details
Design Doc - LINK
PRD - LINK
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add unit tests for the
updateImpersonationRequestfeature in validator, model, and service layers, including necessary type enhancements to support the testing of impersonation request updates.Why are these changes being made?
These changes ensure the correctness and robustness of the
updateImpersonationRequestfunctionality by validating behavior under various scenarios, such as handling valid and invalid input, confirming error handling, and updating request statuses accurately. Enhancements in types were necessary to provide structured data for the newly developed test cases.