Update README.md to fix active-enum and passive-enum commands

[DexterNano]

Changed the format of passive-enum and active-enum commands from “-” to “” because they are invoked with “”.

[RoganDawes]

Not sure why you believe that the command should be passive_enum? I see the following in the actual code (as opposed to documentation):

logitacker/logitacker_cli.c:    NRF_CLI_CMD(passive-enum, NULL, "enter passive enumeration mode", cmd_discover_onhit_passiveenum),
logitacker/logitacker_cli.c:        NRF_CLI_CMD(passive-enum, NULL, "start passive enumeration of newly paired device", cmd_pair_sniff_onsuccess_passiveenum),
logitacker/logitacker_cli.c:        NRF_CLI_CMD(active-enum, NULL, "start passive enumeration of newly paired device", cmd_pair_sniff_onsuccess_activeenum),
logitacker/logitacker_cli.c:    NRF_CLI_CMD(passive-enum, NULL, "enter passive enumeration", cmd_inject_onsuccess_passiveenum),
logitacker/logitacker_cli.c:    NRF_CLI_CMD(passive-enum, NULL, "enter passive enumeration", cmd_inject_onfail_passiveenum),
logitacker/logitacker_cli.c:    NRF_CLI_CMD(passive-enum, &m_sub_options_passiveenum, "options for passive-enum mode", cmd_help),

And https://docs.nordicsemi.com/bundle/sdk_nrf5_v16.0.0/page/group_nrf_cli.html#gadad7620e8e2c98c0d983963f80e2aff8 indicates that the first parameter should be the text of the command option.

Does the code not work with active-enum/passive-enum ?

[DexterNano]

Hi, thanks for the rapid response.

For some reason it does not seam to work for me

LOGITacker (discover) $ active-enum B4:8F:96:**:**
active-enum: command not found

VS

LOGITacker (discover) $ active_enum B4:8F:96:**:**
Starting active enumeration for device B4:8F:96:**:**

Maybe it has something to do with my spanish keyboard? But i can´t see how that can be the problem

[RoganDawes]

Hmm, interesting! I wonder if that is an artifact of some deeper processing in the Nordic SDK. I will have to look deeper into it, I guess! Thanks!