feat(api): add Llama 3.3 70B Instruct to AWS Bedrock model options

[Premshay]

Description

Added Llama 3.3 70B Instruct model configuration to the AWS Bedrock provider options in api.ts. This enables users to utilize the new Llama model through AWS Bedrock integration.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Checklist:

• My code follows the patterns of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• [] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

Additional context

Related Issues

Reviewers

---

Important

Add meta.llama3-3-70b-instruct-v1:0 model to AWS Bedrock options in api.ts.

• Behavior:
  • Added meta.llama3-3-70b-instruct-v1:0 model to bedrockModels in api.ts.
  • Model has maxTokens of 8192, contextWindow of 128,000, and does not support images, computer use, or prompt cache.
  • Input and output pricing set to 0.72.

^{This description was created by for d93a7a7. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: d93a7a7

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[Premshay]

When documenting in changelog should note "Added Llama 3.3 70B Instruct model to the AWS Bedrock provider options"

[mrubens]

Thank you! Want to use npx changeset to add a patch release with the notes you mentioned?

[mrubens]

Or I can do it later - whatever is easiest for you. Thank you for the contribution!

[Premshay]

Yeah, I forgot what's the correct way so left the comment. I won't be able to do it until tomorrow, so better skip me this time and I'll try to remember the process next time.

…

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025, 21:58 Matt Rubens ***@***.***> wrote: Or I can do it later - whatever is easiest for you. Thank you for the contribution! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#520 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGWMILADSTX3QKCH42V776D2MFCX5AVCNFSM6AAAAABVYCQUBWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMJQHEYDANRZGQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>