-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Feature/add fetch first approach #6683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/add fetch first approach #6683
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your contribution! I've reviewed the changes and found several issues that need attention before this can be merged.
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return "" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The return statement here is unreachable since the loop either returns a value or throws an error. Consider removing this line:
| const URL_FETCH_FALLBACK_TIMEOUT = 20_000 // 20 seconds for fallback | ||
| const MAX_FETCH_RETRIES = 3 // Number of retries for transient errors | ||
| const USER_AGENT = | ||
| "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/58.0.3029.110 Safari/537.3" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this Chrome version intentional? Chrome 58 is from 2017. Current stable is 120+. Consider updating to a more recent version for better compatibility.
| } | ||
| /* | ||
| let content = await this.fetchUrlContent(url) | ||
| const analyzedContent = await analyzeWebsite(content) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function could throw errors during HTML parsing. Should we wrap this in a try-catch to handle parsing failures gracefully?
| score, | ||
| details, | ||
| } | ||
| } catch (error: any) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using type defeats TypeScript's type safety. Consider:
Failed to process HTML. Reason:
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Analyzes a website's HTML to determine if it likely requires JavaScript to render meaningful content. | ||
| * Uses fetch API instead of axios. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The JSDoc mentions "Uses fetch API instead of axios" but this function doesn't use fetch - it just analyzes HTML. Could we update this comment to be more accurate?
|
|
||
| if ($("noscript").length > 0) { | ||
| details.hasNoScriptTag = true | ||
| score -= 50 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These magic numbers make the scoring logic hard to understand. Would it help to extract them as named constants? For example:
Additional Review FeedbackCritical Issues:
|
Related GitHub Issue
Closes: #
Roo Code Task Context (Optional)
Description
This PR introduces several improvements to the URL content fetching mechanism, making it more robust and intelligent.
Key Changes:
Smarter Content Fetching:
application (SPA) that requires JavaScript to render its content.
unnecessary browser launching for static sites, improving performance and resource usage.
Improved Fetching Robustness:
slow-loading pages.
Impact:
These changes lead to a more efficient, reliable, and intelligent URL content fetching service. By avoiding Puppeteer for static sites, the system will be faster and consume fewer resources.
Test Procedure
Pre-Submission Checklist
Screenshots / Videos
Documentation Updates
Additional Notes
Get in Touch