Skip to content

Conversation

@mrubens
Copy link
Collaborator

@mrubens mrubens commented Aug 22, 2025

Important

Add custom base URL support for Requesty, DeepSeek V3.1 model to Chutes AI, and revert Roo modes loading feature.

  • Features:
    • Add custom base URL support for Requesty provider.
    • Add DeepSeek V3.1 model to Chutes AI provider.
  • Reversion:
    • Revert feature enabling loading Roo modes from multiple files in .roo/roo_modes directory.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 3f68523. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@mrubens mrubens requested review from cte and jr as code owners August 22, 2025 20:47
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 22, 2025
@mrubens mrubens merged commit 777a9d9 into main Aug 22, 2025
14 checks passed
@mrubens mrubens deleted the release/v3.25.23 branch August 22, 2025 20:47
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from New to Done in Roo Code Roadmap Aug 22, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Triage to Done in Roo Code Roadmap Aug 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@roomote roomote bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for adding the changeset for v3.25.23! I've reviewed the changes post-merge and have a couple of observations for future releases.

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
---
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is using the version number as the changeset filename intentional? Typically, changesets use random adjective-noun combinations (like ) to avoid conflicts and follow the standard changeset conventions. This might be worth considering for future changesets to ensure compatibility with changeset tooling.

"roo-cline": patch
---

- feat: add custom base URL support for Requesty provider (#7274 by @requesty-JohnCosta27, PR by @daniel-lxs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we consider a more concise attribution format for future changesets? For example: instead of the current format. This would make the changeset entries more readable while still giving proper credit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants