feat: integrate CodeRabbit MCP server #7776
Conversation
- Add CodeRabbit MCP marketplace configuration with multiple installation methods (NPX, Docker, Local) - Create local test configuration for CodeRabbit MCP server - Add comprehensive tests for CodeRabbit MCP integration - Support for CodeRabbit API key and various configuration parameters - Enable context-aware code review and analysis capabilities Fixes #7775
dosubot
bot
added
size:L
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ | |||
| import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The imports 'vi' and 'beforeEach' are not used in this test file. Removing unused imports can improve code clarity.
| import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest" | |
| import { describe, it, expect } from "vitest" |
![roomote[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1546624?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| describe("Local MCP Configuration", () => { | ||
| it("should have a valid local MCP configuration for testing", async () => { | ||
| const mcpConfigPath = path.join(process.cwd(), "..", ".roo", "mcp.json") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test expects a file to exist, but it's not included in the PR. The test will fail with a file not found error. Should we either:
- Add the missing file with the CodeRabbit configuration
- Skip this test if the file doesn't exist
- Remove this test entirely if it's not needed?
| describe("Marketplace Configuration", () => { | ||
| it("should have a valid CodeRabbit MCP marketplace configuration", async () => { | ||
| // Read the CodeRabbit marketplace configuration | ||
| const configPath = path.join(process.cwd(), "..", "marketplace", "mcps", "coderabbit.yaml") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This path construction assumes the test runs from a specific directory. Could this be fragile? Consider using a more robust approach to locate the marketplace directory, perhaps using or a configuration constant.
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| describe("MCP Server Tools", () => { | ||
| it("should define expected CodeRabbit MCP tools", () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This appears to be a placeholder test with no actual verification logic. Should we either implement real tool verification or remove this placeholder to avoid confusion?
| - name: "Review Language" | ||
| key: "CODERABBIT_LANGUAGE" | ||
| placeholder: "en, es, fr, de, etc. (default: en)" | ||
| optional: true No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor: Missing trailing newline. While not critical, it's a common convention for text files.
hannesrudolph
added
the
Issue/PR - Triage
|
Not enough infor |
Summary
This PR attempts to address Issue #7775 by integrating CodeRabbit MCP servers to enhance code quality analysis and improve consistency across repositories.
Changes
🎯 Added CodeRabbit MCP marketplace configuration with three installation methods:
📝 Created comprehensive test suite for CodeRabbit MCP integration
🔧 Added local test configuration ()
Features
Testing
All tests pass successfully:
References
Notes
The MCP server is disabled by default in the local configuration for security. Users will need to:
Feedback and guidance are welcome!
Important
Integrates CodeRabbit MCP server with multiple installation methods and comprehensive testing for enhanced code review capabilities.
coderabbit.yamlfor CodeRabbit MCP server configuration with NPX, Docker, and Local installation methods.coderabbit-mcp.spec.tswith tests for marketplace configuration, JSON content parsing, and local MCP configuration.This description was created by
for 98b60b8. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.