Skip to content

Conversation

@UriZafrir
Copy link

@UriZafrir UriZafrir commented Sep 18, 2025

Related GitHub Issue

Closes:
#8146

Roo Code Task Context (Optional)

Description

Test Procedure

Pre-Submission Checklist

  • Issue Linked: This PR is linked to an approved GitHub Issue (see "Related GitHub Issue" above).
  • Scope: My changes are focused on the linked issue (one major feature/fix per PR).
  • Self-Review: I have performed a thorough self-review of my code.
  • Testing: New and/or updated tests have been added to cover my changes (if applicable).
  • Documentation Impact: I have considered if my changes require documentation updates (see "Documentation Updates" section below).
  • Contribution Guidelines: I have read and agree to the Contributor Guidelines.

Screenshots / Videos

image

Documentation Updates

Additional Notes

Get in Touch


Important

shouldUseSingleFileRead in single-file-read-models.ts now always returns false, disabling single file read for all models.

  • Behavior:
    • shouldUseSingleFileRead in single-file-read-models.ts now always returns false, disabling single file read for all models.
  • Misc:
    • Removes unused parameter modelId from shouldUseSingleFileRead.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 929a68f. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. bug Something isn't working labels Sep 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@roomote roomote bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your contribution! I've reviewed the changes and found several issues that need attention. While this fix addresses the immediate problem by disabling the single-file read mode for all models (allowing Grok to use the full read_file tool with line range support), there are some concerns about the implementation approach and missing documentation.

export function shouldUseSingleFileRead(modelId: string): boolean {
return modelId.includes("grok-code-fast-1")
export function shouldUseSingleFileRead(_modelId: string): boolean {
return false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this intended as a permanent fix? With this change, shouldUseSingleFileRead() always returns false, making this function and the entire simpleReadFileTool effectively dead code. If this is the final solution, should we consider removing this function and all related code entirely?

Alternatively, would it be better to fix the simpleReadFileTool to support line ranges for models that truly need the simplified format?


/**
* Check if a model should use single file read format
* @param modelId The model ID to check
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The JSDoc comment still says "Check if a model should use single file read format" and "@returns true if the model should use single file reads", but the function now always returns false. Could you update the documentation to reflect the current behavior?

Suggested change
* @param modelId The model ID to check
/**
* Check if a model should use single file read format
* @param modelId The model ID to check
* @returns false - Single file read mode is currently disabled for all models
*/

*/
export function shouldUseSingleFileRead(modelId: string): boolean {
return modelId.includes("grok-code-fast-1")
export function shouldUseSingleFileRead(_modelId: string): boolean {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The modelId parameter is now prefixed with underscore to indicate it's unused, but the function still accepts it. If we're keeping this function, should we deprecate it properly with a @deprecated tag? Or if this is temporary, could you add a TODO comment explaining the plan?

@hannesrudolph hannesrudolph added the Issue/PR - Triage New issue. Needs quick review to confirm validity and assign labels. label Sep 18, 2025
@daniel-lxs
Copy link
Member

Closing, see #8146 (comment)

@daniel-lxs daniel-lxs closed this Sep 23, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from New to Done in Roo Code Roadmap Sep 23, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Triage to Done in Roo Code Roadmap Sep 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working Issue/PR - Triage New issue. Needs quick review to confirm validity and assign labels. size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants