-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
roadmap 2026 #8590
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
roadmap 2026 #8590
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found several critical security and quality issues that need immediate attention.
| "http://182.92.129.55:11434|deepseek-r1:70b" \ | ||
| "http://20.42.220.26:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://189.155.184.116:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://121.6.50.203:11434|deepseek-r1:14b"; do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Security Risk - Exposed IP Addresses and Potential Unauthorized Access
This file contains a hardcoded list of public IP addresses with open ports that appear to be testing endpoints for DeepSeek AI models. This raises several serious concerns:
- Security exposure: These IPs may belong to private infrastructure that shouldn't be publicly documented
- Unauthorized access: Testing against third-party servers without permission could violate terms of service
- No authentication: The script attempts to connect to these servers without any authentication mechanism
- Production risk: If committed, this could expose internal testing infrastructure
This file should be removed from the repository entirely. If server testing is needed, use:
- Environment variables for server URLs
- A
.env.exampletemplate without real IPs - Proper authentication mechanisms
- Only test against authorized infrastructure
| @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | |||
| for server in \ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major: Missing Shebang and Execute Permissions
The script is missing a shebang line (e.g., #!/bin/bash) which is required for proper script execution. Without it, the shell interpreter must be explicitly specified when running the script.
|
|
||
| # Qdrant | ||
| qdrant_storage/ | ||
| qdrant/qdrant_data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Inconsistent Ignore Pattern
Line 51 uses qdrant_storage/ (with trailing slash) while line 52 uses qdrant/qdrant_data (without trailing slash). For consistency and clarity, both should use the same pattern style. Recommend:
qdrant_storage/
qdrant/qdrant_data/
| @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
| version: '3.8' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Outdated Docker Compose Version
The version: '3.8' field is deprecated in newer Docker Compose versions (v1.27.0+). Modern Docker Compose no longer requires the version field. Consider removing it:
services:
qdrant:
# ...|
|
||
| ### 相关链接 | ||
|
|
||
| - [GitHub 仓库](https://github.com/RooVetGit/Roo-Cline) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Broken Repository Link
The GitHub repository link points to https://github.com/RooVetGit/Roo-Cline which appears to be incorrect. Based on the PR context, it should be https://github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code.
| ### 相关链接 | ||
|
|
||
| - [GitHub 仓库](https://github.com/RooVetGit/Roo-Cline) | ||
| - [VSCode 扩展市场](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=RooVetGit.roo-cline) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Incorrect Extension Marketplace Link
The VSCode extension marketplace link references RooVetGit.roo-cline which doesn't match the current repository name. This should be updated to match the actual extension ID.
| services: | ||
| # Qdrant 向量数据库 | ||
| qdrant: | ||
| image: qdrant/qdrant:latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider pinning the Qdrant image to a specific version (instead of using 'latest') to ensure reproducibility and avoid unexpected updates.
| image: qdrant/qdrant:latest | |
| image: qdrant/qdrant:1.7.3 |
| url=$(echo $server | cut -d'|' -f1) | ||
| model=$(echo $server | cut -d'|' -f2) | ||
| echo -n "Testing $url ($model) ... " | ||
| if curl -s --connect-timeout 3 "$url/api/tags" | grep -q "$model"; then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding curl’s --fail flag or logging error details to improve debugging if a server fails to respond, as the current test just echoes 'FAIL'.
| if curl -s --connect-timeout 3 "$url/api/tags" | grep -q "$model"; then | |
| if curl -sf --connect-timeout 3 "$url/api/tags" | grep -q "$model"; then |
| ...modifiedOldUserContent | ||
| ] | ||
|
|
||
| if (responseText) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typographical error: In the resumeTaskFromHistory() function, the variable is destructured as { response, text, images } from this.ask("resume_task"), but the code checks if (responseText) { ... } instead of using if (text) { ... }. Please correct the variable name.
| | 内存占用过高 | 中 | 中 | 限制同时加载的文件数,使用流式处理 | | ||
| | 输出截断 | 高 | 高 | 多重验证机制,智能重试 | | ||
| | 用户体验复杂 | 中 | 低 | 提供简单的默认配置,渐进式暴露高级选项 | | ||
| | 并发冲突 | 低 | 低 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The risk table row starting with "并发冲突" appears incomplete. The following line "使用文件锁机制" does not have the expected columns. Please check and format this table row appropriately.
| | 并发冲突 | 低 | 低 | | |
| | 并发冲突 | 低 | 低 | 使用文件锁机制 | |
|
|
||
| ```typescript | ||
| class TaskAnalyzer { | ||
| // 分析任务并推荐代 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Typographical error: The comment appears as "理推荐代理" which seems to be a truncated or misplaced comment. Consider revising it to something like "分析任务并推荐代理" for clarity.
| // 分析任务并推荐代 | |
| // 分析任务并推荐代理 |
- 在Task.dispose.test.ts中导入RooCodeEventName枚举 - 将事件名称从字符串改为使用RooCodeEventName枚举值 - taskStateChanged -> RooCodeEventName.TaskActive - taskAskResponded -> RooCodeEventName.TaskAskResponded - 确保事件监听器类型正确匹配TaskEvents定义
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR has several critical issues that need to be addressed before it can be merged.
| "http://182.92.129.55:11434|deepseek-r1:70b" \ | ||
| "http://20.42.220.26:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://189.155.184.116:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://121.6.50.203:11434|deepseek-r1:14b"; do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Security/Privacy Issue
This file contains hardcoded IP addresses that appear to be internal/private servers. This should NOT be committed to a public repository as it:
- Exposes potentially private infrastructure
- Creates security risks
- Has no clear purpose in the codebase
- Appears to be a personal testing script
This entire file should be removed from the PR. If server testing is needed, it should:
- Use environment variables or configuration files (gitignored)
- Be documented separately
- Not expose internal IP addresses
| @@ -0,0 +1,1685 @@ | |||
| # 多代理协作系统需求分析与技术设计 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major: Documentation Language Inconsistency
This documentation is written entirely in Chinese, while the rest of the project's documentation is in English. This creates:
- Accessibility issues for international contributors
- Inconsistency in the documentation set
- Maintenance challenges
Consider either:
- Translating to English to match existing docs
- Creating a separate localized docs directory (e.g.,
docs/zh-CN/) - Providing both English and Chinese versions
| @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | |||
| version: '3.8' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major: Missing Context and Documentation
This adds Qdrant infrastructure without:
- Explaining why it's needed
- Documenting how to use it
- Linking to related code changes that use it
- Providing setup instructions
The PR description should explain:
- What feature requires Qdrant?
- How does this integrate with the codebase?
- What are the setup/deployment requirements?
| return `## attempt_completion | ||
| Description: After each tool use, the user will respond with the result of that tool use, i.e. if it succeeded or failed, along with any reasons for failure. Once you've received the results of tool uses and can confirm that the task is complete, use this tool to present the result of your work to the user. The user may respond with feedback if they are not satisfied with the result, which you can use to make improvements and try again. | ||
| CRITICAL COMPLETION CHECKLIST - You MUST verify ALL of these before using this tool: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Formatting Inconsistency
The checklist uses checkmark symbols (✓) and emoji (🚨) which may not render consistently across all environments. Consider using plain text markers like:
CRITICAL COMPLETION CHECKLIST - You MUST verify ALL of these:
a) [REQUIRED] Received explicit success confirmation...
b) [REQUIRED] The core task objective is 100% complete...
This ensures consistent rendering in all contexts where the prompt is displayed.
| 2. Work through these goals sequentially, utilizing available tools one at a time as necessary. Each goal should correspond to a distinct step in your problem-solving process. You will be informed on the work completed and what's remaining as you go. | ||
| 3. Remember, you have extensive capabilities with access to a wide range of tools that can be used in powerful and clever ways as necessary to accomplish each goal. Before calling a tool, do some analysis. ${codebaseSearchInstruction}analyze the file structure provided in environment_details to gain context and insights for proceeding effectively. Next, think about which of the provided tools is the most relevant tool to accomplish the user's task. Go through each of the required parameters of the relevant tool and determine if the user has directly provided or given enough information to infer a value. When deciding if the parameter can be inferred, carefully consider all the context to see if it supports a specific value. If all of the required parameters are present or can be reasonably inferred, proceed with the tool use. BUT, if one of the values for a required parameter is missing, DO NOT invoke the tool (not even with fillers for the missing params) and instead, ask the user to provide the missing parameters using the ask_followup_question tool. DO NOT ask for more information on optional parameters if it is not provided. | ||
| 4. Once you've completed the user's task, you must use the attempt_completion tool to present the result of the task to the user. | ||
| 4. Once you've completed the user's task, you must use the attempt_completion tool to present the result of the task to the user. A task is considered complete ONLY when ALL of the following are true: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick: Formatting
The completion criteria list is well-structured, but the indentation could be more consistent. Consider aligning the sub-items:
4. Once you've completed the user's task, you must use the attempt_completion tool to present the result of the task to the user. A task is considered complete ONLY when ALL of the following are true:
a) All code changes have been successfully applied and you've received confirmation from the user
b) If the task required testing, tests have been run and passed
...This improves readability in the generated prompt.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR has several critical issues that must be addressed before merging.
| "http://182.92.129.55:11434|deepseek-r1:70b" \ | ||
| "http://20.42.220.26:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://189.155.184.116:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://121.6.50.203:11434|deepseek-r1:14b"; do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: Security Issue - Exposed Server IPs
This file contains a hardcoded list of 26 server IP addresses with ports. This appears to be internal infrastructure that should NOT be committed to a public repository.
Issues:
- Exposes internal server infrastructure to the public
- Creates security vulnerabilities by revealing server endpoints
- No clear purpose or documentation for why this is needed
- File name
test.shis too generic and doesn't explain its purpose
Recommendation:
Remove this file entirely from the PR. If server testing is needed:
- Use environment variables or a config file that's gitignored
- Document the purpose clearly
- Never commit actual server IPs to version control
| @@ -0,0 +1,1685 @@ | |||
| # 多代理协作系统需求分析与技术设计 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major: Documentation Language Inconsistency
This entire documentation file is written in Chinese, while all other documentation in the repository is in English. This creates inconsistency and accessibility issues for the international developer community.
Issues:
- Breaks documentation consistency (all other docs are in English)
- Limits accessibility for non-Chinese speaking contributors
- Makes code review difficult for maintainers who don't read Chinese
Recommendation:
Either:
- Translate this document to English to match the rest of the documentation
- Or create a localized docs structure (e.g.,
docs/zh-CN/anddocs/en/)
| **版本**: 1.0.0 | ||
| **最后更新**: 2025-10-10 | ||
|
|
||
| 此文档定义了 Roo-Code 多代理协作系统的完整架构和实施方案,整合了现有的子任务机制、批量模式和裁判模式,形成了一个强大而灵活的多代理编排平台。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major: Missing Implementation
This 1685-line document describes a comprehensive multi-agent collaboration system, but there's no actual implementation code in this PR. The document describes:
- Agent registry and profiles
- Task decomposition engine
- Multi-agent scheduler
- Conflict resolution
- Result integration
However, none of these components exist in the codebase changes.
Recommendation:
Either:
- Remove this documentation until the implementation is ready
- Or clearly mark it as a "Design Proposal" or "RFC" rather than architecture documentation
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| build-preview: | ||
| name: Build ROO CODEP Preview |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Typo in Job Name
Build ROO CODEP Preview should be Build ROO CODE Preview (missing the 'E' in CODE).
| import { fileExistsAtPath } from "../../utils/fs" | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * 图片外部化存储管理器 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Mixed Language Comments
The file contains Chinese comments mixed with English code. For consistency and international collaboration, all comments should be in English.
Example on lines 6-15:
/**
* 图片外部化存储管理器
*
* 功能:
* - 将Base64图片数据保存到磁盘文件Should be:
/**
* Image externalization storage manager
*
* Features:
* - Save Base64 image data to disk files
src/core/task/Task.ts
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private async addToClineMessages(message: ClineMessage) { | ||
| // 检测并处理Base64图片数据 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Major: Missing Error Handling
The image saving logic wraps the entire operation in a try-catch but continues silently on failure with just a console.error. If image saving fails, the message will retain the full Base64 data, defeating the purpose of the optimization.
Issues:
- Silent failure could lead to memory issues the optimization was meant to solve
- No telemetry or user notification of the failure
- Inconsistent state: some images saved, others not
Recommendation:
Add proper error handling:
- Log to telemetry service
- Consider retrying the save operation
- Notify user if persistent failures occur
src/core/task/Task.ts
Outdated
| * Schedule a debounced save operation. | ||
| * Multiple rapid calls will be coalesced into a single save. | ||
| */ | ||
| private scheduleSave() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Potential Race Condition
The scheduleSave() method uses a debounce timer, but there's no guarantee that pending saves complete before critical operations. While flushPendingSave() exists, it's not clear if it's called before all critical operations (e.g., task disposal, API calls).
Recommendation:
Ensure flushPendingSave() is called:
- Before task disposal
- Before API calls that depend on persisted state
- Before context compression operations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No new issues found - all concerns already addressed in existing comments.
- 修改 mergeExtensionState 函数,确保 taskHistory 始终创建新数组引用 - 即使内容相同,新引用也能触发 React 重新渲染 - 添加完整的单元测试覆盖所有场景 - 解决了 clearTask 后新建对话历史不显示的问题
| "http://182.92.129.55:11434|deepseek-r1:70b" \ | ||
| "http://20.42.220.26:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://189.155.184.116:11434|deepseek-r1:32b" \ | ||
| "http://121.6.50.203:11434|deepseek-r1:14b"; do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security Concern: Exposed Server Endpoints
This script contains hardcoded IP addresses and server endpoints that appear to be internal/private infrastructure. Exposing these in a public repository creates several security risks:
- Attack Surface: Public exposure of internal server IPs makes them targets for attacks
- Information Disclosure: Reveals infrastructure topology and model deployment details
- Unauthorized Access: If these servers lack proper authentication, they could be accessed by anyone
These endpoints should be:
- Removed from the repository entirely, OR
- Moved to environment variables/configuration files that are gitignored, OR
- Replaced with example/placeholder values if this is meant to be a template
If these are truly public endpoints meant to be shared, they should be documented as such with appropriate security measures in place.
| @@ -0,0 +1,1685 @@ | |||
| # 多代理协作系统需求分析与技术设计 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Language Consistency Concern
This documentation is written entirely in Chinese, while the project's primary language appears to be English (based on README.md, code comments, and other documentation). This creates several issues:
- Accessibility: Non-Chinese speaking contributors cannot understand this design document
- Maintenance: Mixed-language documentation is harder to maintain and keep synchronized
- Collaboration: International team members may be excluded from discussions about this feature
Consider either:
- Translating this to English to match the project's primary language, OR
- Providing both English and Chinese versions (with English as the primary), OR
- Documenting the project's language policy if Chinese is intentionally being adopted
Note: If this is intended for a Chinese-specific fork or deployment, that context should be clarified in the PR description.
| - "6333:6333" # REST API | ||
| - "6334:6334" # gRPC API | ||
| volumes: | ||
| - ./qdrant_data:/qdrant/storage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Volume Mount Path Consideration
The volume is mounted to ./qdrant_data which is a relative path. This could lead to issues:
- Location Ambiguity: The data will be stored relative to wherever
docker-compose upis run from, which may not always be theqdrant/directory - Gitignore: Ensure
qdrant_data/is added to.gitignoreto prevent accidentally committing database files - Documentation: Consider adding a README in the
qdrant/directory explaining:- How to start the service
- Where data is stored
- How to backup/restore data
- Connection details for the application
Consider using an absolute path or documenting that this compose file must be run from the qdrant/ directory specifically.
- 修复 shouldInvokeJudge is not a function 错误 - 在 Task.ts 中实现 7 个裁判相关方法: * getJudgeConfig() - 获取裁判配置 * shouldInvokeJudge() - 判断是否应调用裁判 * buildEnhancedTaskDescription() - 构建增强任务描述,包含最近5条用户反馈 * invokeJudge() - 调用裁判服务 * handleJudgeRejection() - 处理裁判拒绝,支持用户覆盖 * getToolCallHistory() - 获取工具调用历史 * getFileChangeHistory() - 获取文件修改历史 - 修复裁判模式上下文问题:从后往前收集最近用户反馈,确保裁判能看到用户最新需求变化 - 所有测试通过(9/9) - 类型检查通过
| throw new Error("Qdrant client not available") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| await client.delete(this.collectionName, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Type Safety Violation
The code accesses the private client property of vectorStore by casting to any, which breaks encapsulation and type safety. This pattern appears in multiple places (lines 284, 286, 309, 313, 345, 350, 388).
This suggests that IVectorStore interface is missing methods that are actually needed. Consider either:
- Adding the required methods to the
IVectorStoreinterface:
interface IVectorStore {
// ... existing methods
deletePoints(collectionName: string, options: DeleteOptions): Promise<void>
setPayload(collectionName: string, options: SetPayloadOptions): Promise<void>
// etc.
}- Or creating a specialized interface for vector stores that support these operations:
interface IExtendedVectorStore extends IVectorStore {
deleteByFilter(collectionName: string, filter: Filter): Promise<void>
updatePayload(pointId: string, payload: Record<string, any>): Promise<void>
}The current approach undermines TypeScript's type safety and makes the code brittle to refactoring.
| @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | |||
| for server in \ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test script appears to contain hardcoded IP addresses to external servers and should not be committed to the repository. This poses several concerns:
- Security: Exposing server IPs and ports publicly
- Maintainability: Hardcoded external dependencies that may become unavailable
- Purpose unclear: No documentation explaining what this script is for
If this is needed for testing, it should be:
- Moved to
.gitignoreor a.env.examplefile - Documented in the README
- Use environment variables instead of hardcoded values
| ```typescript | ||
| class TaskAnalyzer { | ||
| // 分析任务并推荐代 | ||
| 理推荐代理 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This line contains incomplete/corrupted text. The comment appears to be cut off:
// 分析任务并推荐代
理推荐代理Should be:
// 分析任务并推荐代理| interface Integration | ||
| Report { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interface name appears to be split across lines. This will cause a syntax error:
interface Integration
Report {Should be:
| interface Integration | |
| Report { | |
| interface IntegrationReport { |
主要改进: 1. 在裁判分析前显示'正在分析'提示,改善用户体验 2. 重新设计上下文采集策略为'原始任务+智能上下文总结' - 始终保留第一条原始任务描述 - 智能提取最后3条用户需求变更 - 智能提取最后2条任务完成尝试 - 添加工具使用统计以了解已执行操作 3. 更新单元测试以验证新的上下文总结逻辑 4. 更新pnpm-lock.yaml修复GitHub Action构建错误 文件更改: - src/core/tools/attemptCompletionTool.ts: 添加实时UI提示 - src/core/task/Task.ts: 重写buildEnhancedTaskDescription方法 - src/core/judge/__tests__/JudgeService.test.ts: 更新测试用例 - pnpm-lock.yaml: 同步依赖锁定文件
- 修复当approved=false时错误显示为✅批准的bug - 使用正确的if-else逻辑区分批准和拒绝情况 - 修复Task.getJudgeConfig()中blockOnCriticalIssues字段缺失导致的TypeScript类型错误 - 使用对象展开运算符确保配置始终包含所有必需字段 - 更新相关测试文件以匹配新的类型定义
…dance - Add detailed usage scenarios to new_task tool prompts - Include when to use and when NOT to use new_task - Add comparison with update_todo_list tool - Recommend hybrid approach for complex tasks - Add task decomposition strategy section to objective prompts - Add comprehensive test coverage for new guidance sections - All tests passing (16/16) Related docs: docs/33-task-decomposition-analysis-and-improvements.md
| * 计算两个文本 | ||
| /** | ||
| * 计算两个文本的相似度(Jaccard相似度) | ||
| */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Malformed JSDoc comment with duplicate opening. Line 405 has an incomplete comment that should be removed:
| * 计算两个文本 | |
| /** | |
| * 计算两个文本的相似度(Jaccard相似度) | |
| */ | |
| /** | |
| * 计算两个文本的相似度(Jaccard相似度) | |
| */ |
Related GitHub Issue
Closes: #
Roo Code Task Context (Optional)
Description
Test Procedure
Pre-Submission Checklist
Screenshots / Videos
Documentation Updates
Additional Notes
Get in Touch
Important
This pull request introduces a multi-agent collaboration system, updates documentation, and adds Qdrant setup and a server test script.
docs/14-multi-agent-collaboration-system.md.architect,code-writer,test-writer, etc.docs/README.mdto include new documentation links and descriptions.qdrant/docker-compose.yamlfor setting up Qdrant vector database.test.shto test server availability and model response.This description was created by
for e5949f9. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.