Skip to content

Conversation

@roomote
Copy link

@roomote roomote bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Summary

Created a new page as an alternative version of the existing page with completely different messaging approach.

What Changed

  • New page route: accessible from the web app
  • Alternative messaging: More direct, edgier tone focusing on AI-generated code risks
  • Maintains same structure: Uses identical component hierarchy as but with different content

Key Messaging Differences

The new page emphasizes:

  • Security concerns: JWT verification bugs, rounding errors that affect billing
  • AI chaos: Problems with AI-generated code that looks correct but has hidden issues
  • Paranoid senior dev angle: Positions Roo as that cautious team member who catches subtle bugs
  • Specific examples: Uses concrete review comment examples (regex backtracking, numeric sorting, decimal handling)
  • Problem-first approach: Leads with the pain points before introducing the solution

Technical Details

  • Created with proper metadata and SEO
  • Implemented with new content sections
  • Reuses existing components: , , and UI components
  • Fully responsive and follows existing design patterns
  • Build and type checks pass successfully

Testing

✅ Page builds successfully
✅ No TypeScript errors
✅ Linting passes
✅ Accessible at route

This alternative messaging can be A/B tested against the original page to see which resonates better with the target audience.


Important

Adds a new PR Reviewer page with alternative messaging focusing on AI-generated code risks, reusing existing components and maintaining the original structure.

  • New Page:
    • Adds PRReviewerContent.tsx and page.tsx for a new PR Reviewer page with alternative messaging.
    • Emphasizes security concerns, AI-generated code risks, and a problem-first approach.
    • Uses specific examples like regex backtracking and numeric sorting.
  • Components and Structure:
    • Reuses existing components such as Button, AnimatedBackground, and AgentCarousel.
    • Maintains the same component hierarchy as the original page.
  • SEO and Responsiveness:
    • Adds SEO metadata in page.tsx with OpenGraph and Twitter card details.
    • Fully responsive design following existing patterns.
  • Testing:
    • Page builds successfully with no TypeScript errors and passes linting.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 8925a80. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

- Created /pr-reviewer route with new page component
- Implemented PRReviewerContent with edgier, more direct messaging
- Focus on AI-generated code risks and security concerns
- Uses same structure as /reviewer but with completely different copy
- Emphasizes paranoid senior developer angle
- Highlights specific issues: JWT bugs, regex backtracking, billing errors
@roomote roomote bot requested review from cte, jr and mrubens as code owners November 3, 2025 14:38
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 3, 2025
@roomote
Copy link
Author

roomote bot commented Nov 3, 2025

See this task on Roo Code Cloud

Re-reviewed latest changes. The previously flagged SEO issue remains unresolved.

  • Update page title to be distinct from /reviewer page for proper SEO (both currently use "PR Reviewer")
Previous Reviews

Mention @roomote in a comment to trigger your PR Fixer agent and make changes to this pull request.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2025

🚀 Preview deployed!

Your changes have been deployed to Vercel:

Preview URL: https://roo-code-website-qqtxereje-roo-code.vercel.app

This preview will be updated automatically when you push new commits to this PR.

import { ogImageUrl } from "@/lib/og"
import { PRReviewerContent } from "./PRReviewerContent"

const TITLE = "PR Reviewer"
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both /reviewer and /pr-reviewer pages use identical titles ("PR Reviewer"), which creates SEO conflicts. Search engines will struggle to differentiate these pages, potentially hurting rankings for both. For effective A/B testing and SEO, use distinct titles like "Roo AI PR Reviewer" or "AI-Powered PR Review" for this alternative page.

@hannesrudolph hannesrudolph added the Issue/PR - Triage New issue. Needs quick review to confirm validity and assign labels. label Nov 3, 2025
@mrubens mrubens closed this Nov 3, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from New to Done in Roo Code Roadmap Nov 3, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Triage to Done in Roo Code Roadmap Nov 3, 2025
@daniel-lxs daniel-lxs reopened this Nov 3, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Done to Triage in Roo Code Roadmap Nov 3, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Done to New in Roo Code Roadmap Nov 3, 2025
@roomote
Copy link
Author

roomote bot commented Nov 3, 2025

See this task on Roo Code Cloud

Re-reviewed latest changes. The previously flagged SEO issue remains unresolved.

  • Update page title to be distinct from /reviewer page for proper SEO (both currently use "PR Reviewer")

Mention @roomote in a comment to trigger your PR Fixer agent and make changes to this pull request.

import { ogImageUrl } from "@/lib/og"
import { PRReviewerContent } from "./PRReviewerContent"

const TITLE = "PR Reviewer"
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both /reviewer and /pr-reviewer pages use identical titles ("PR Reviewer"), creating SEO conflicts. Search engines cannot differentiate these pages, hurting rankings for both and preventing effective A/B testing. Use a distinct title like "AI Code Review Tool", "Roo AI PR Reviewer", or "Automated PR Review" for this alternative page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request Issue/PR - Triage New issue. Needs quick review to confirm validity and assign labels. size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Status: Triage

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants