Fix Nix build issue

[ApprenticeofEnder]

Why

• Nix flake wasn't building properly, now it is

What

• Updated the go.sum file to reference hashicorp/copywrite
• Updated vendor hash in default.nix because Nix

References

• closes Nix build fails due to missing go.sum entry? #389

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated project dependencies to latest versions.
  • Applied minor code formatting adjustments for consistency.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR updates the Nix build configuration for Terramaid with a refreshed vendorHash and minor formatting adjustments to align the subPackages and ldflags attributes. The vendorHash change resolves the missing go.sum entry issue reported in the linked issue.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Nix Build Configuration default.nix	Updated vendorHash from sha256-CfUrdpNkjkmXO09eyDDWmYNy7vDGXxQCiKmPI3uo96s= to sha256-ZnYGyoKYnx9inSA2FryFds5jAf3L45nAsgm5ElXtv9Y= to resolve missing go.sum dependencies. Simplified ldflags formatting to a single quoted list and aligned subPackages quoting style. Minor whitespace adjustments for consistency.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• feat: add Nix flake for package management #193: Introduces the initial Nix derivation for Terramaid that this PR updates with a corrected vendorHash.
• fix: update and fix goreleaser #67: Modifies the ldflags used for version injection, related to the ldflags formatting changes in this PR.

Suggested labels

patch

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Fix Nix build issue' is vague and generic, failing to specify which Nix build issue was fixed or what changes were made.	Consider a more specific title like 'Fix Nix build by updating vendorHash and adding missing go.sum entry' to clearly convey the primary changes.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The pull request addresses issue #389 by adding the missing go.sum entry for github.com/hashicorp/copywrite and updating the vendorHash, resolving the Nix build failure.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes in default.nix (vendorHash update, formatting adjustments, ldflags simplification) are directly related to fixing the Nix build issue described in issue #389.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[ApprenticeofEnder]

Regarding the formatting, I use alejandra on Nix by default, but that's just personal preference. Feel free to format using nixpkgs-fmt since it looks like that's what you've used elsewhere?

[RoseSecurity]

Thanks for the fix!

[RoseSecurity]

The Nix package was implemented by another community member. I personally don't use it, so I appreciate this fix even more

[ApprenticeofEnder]

The Nix package was implemented by another community member. I personally don't use it, so I appreciate this fix even more

No worries, figure this will help adoption among the other Nix-brained folks in the community :D