Skip to content

RubyCloud225/Quantum-Classical-hybrid

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

88 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Algorithm Overview

I’m building a hybrid system that combines classical AI with quantum-inspired methods to achieve high efficiency, scalability, and robustness. Unlike traditional pipelines, my design adds a quantum encoder + compression stage up front and a refinement/error-correction loop at the end, which together reduce cost, improve accuracy, and make the model more production-friendly.

This project is an active work in progress. My goal is to show how quantum-inspired representations can reshape the economics of AI by delivering stronger performance with fewer resources.


Pipeline Breakdown

1) Raw Data → Tokenization

I convert raw input into tokens—structured units the rest of the system can handle consistently.

2) Quantum Encoder (Graph / Qubit-Style Encoding)

I encode tokens into a graph-like, qubit-inspired state (e.g., parameterized gates and entanglement structure).
This creates a compact, information-dense representation with two aims:

  • Preserve salient structure while enabling reversible mapping back to the original domain.
  • Expose topology (graph structure) that downstream components can compress and reason about.

3) Quantum-Inspired Compression & Pruning

I apply compression on the encoded graph/state to remove redundancy (e.g., pruning weak edges/entanglements and merging equivalent substructures) while tracking fidelity metrics.
Result: a smaller, cheaper latent that retains the signal I care about.

4) Latent Diffusion Transformer (DiT, Classical Core)

I run a diffusion-style transformer in latent space.
Operating on the compressed representation lets the model:

  • Capture long-range dependencies efficiently.
  • Train/infer with lower compute and memory than raw-space approaches.

5) Quantum Decoder Layer (Back to Graph/State)

I map the DiT’s latent back onto the quantum-style graph/state so I can:

  • Enforce cycle-consistency with the encoder.
  • Recover structure needed to reconstruct outputs or pass to downstream tasks.

6) Error Estimation & Refinement Loop

I estimate reconstruction error (and diffusion noise mismatch) and run a controller (RNN-style) to adjust encoder/decoder/compression parameters.
This closed loop reduces artifacts, stabilizes training, and improves final accuracy over successive passes.

7) Output Reconstruction

I decode the refined graph/state back to the target domain, producing the final output.


Why This Matters

  • Efficiency: Compressing before modeling means fewer FLOPs, less memory pressure, and faster training/serving—without sacrificing accuracy.
  • Scalability: The latent+graph approach scales to larger datasets and longer contexts with sub-linear cost growth relative to raw-space methods.
  • Resilience: Noise injection plus the error-correction loop makes the system more robust to imperfect or shifting data.
  • Differentiation: Blending latent diffusion with a quantum-style encoder/decoder and graph compression goes beyond classical pipelines.

Business Impact (What this unlocks)

  • Lower infra cost per task: More throughput on the same hardware footprint.
  • Faster iteration cycles: Shorter experiment loops, enabling quicker product improvements.
  • Deployability: A smaller, more stable model is easier to operate, monitor, and scale in production.
  • Defensibility: The hybrid architecture and compression+refinement loop create clear technical differentiation that’s hard to replicate.

Current Status & Next Steps

Status (WIP):

  • ✅ Core tokenization, noise handling, normalization/regression implemented.
  • ✅ DiT backbone training loop running in latent space.
  • Quantum Encoder prototype generating graph/qbit-style states.
  • ✅ Compression/pruning pass with fidelity tracking in early testing.
  • 🔄 Quantum Decoder + cycle-consistency constraints under active tuning.
  • 🔄 Error estimation + RNN controller loop being optimized for stability and convergence.

Next Steps:

  • 📊 Benchmark end-to-end cost vs. accuracy against strong classical baselines.
  • 🧪 Harden the compression criteria (learned + rule-based) and improve fidelity metrics.
  • 🔁 Tighten the encoder/decoder loop for better reversibility and fewer artifacts.
  • 🚀 Extend to enterprise-scale datasets and publish performance/efficiency results.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Sponsor this project

Packages

No packages published

Languages