Closed
Conversation
d9bac27 to
37751e5
Compare
This draft checks effect of the `uv` TICO-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Jihun-Kim <jeyjey6@naver.com>
Contributor
Author
|
It looks like that there is no dramatic change in the time 🤔 With uv (1m 44s): https://github.com/Samsung/TICO/actions/runs/14462237959/job/40556822348?pr=55#step:12:1 |
Contributor
Author
|
IMHO, it reduces the spending time, but not enough to consider to adopt |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This draft checks effect of the
uvTICO-DCO-1.0-Signed-off-by: Jihun-Kim jeyjey6@naver.com
Background (#54 (comment))
In our backend compiler repo,
uvwas applied to some workflows and it speeds up incrediblySo I just want to check if it works in
TICO, tooThis draft is for checking the effect of using
uv:)+) This draft is just for testing
I have no plan to apply it, yet