Skip to content

Conversation

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

Close #2692

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

@baggepinnen
Copy link
Contributor

baggepinnen commented May 28, 2024

Isn't this very breaking? (It looks like it considering the number of tests both here and downstream that broke due to this change) Is there a reason this cannot be supported? All the information is present to separate initial condition from parameters internally, letting the user provide a dict containing both

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member Author

AayushSabharwal commented May 29, 2024

I agree, this looks too breaking to release. Hadn't looked at CI until now.

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member Author

Closing because fixing this is breaking, and letting this remain doesn't cause correctness issues.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Is this a candidate for v10?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Parameter values can be supplied in the initial condition vector

3 participants