Skip to content

Conversation

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

What's left here?

@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal force-pushed the as/lex-sort-eqs branch 2 times, most recently from 622ddd3 to 38da2cc Compare April 24, 2025 07:36
@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 10:57
@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member Author

I have the docs fix ready locally. Waiting on SciML/Catalyst.jl#1251 for tests

@isaacsas
Copy link
Member

That Catalyst PR is now merged.

@isaacsas isaacsas closed this Apr 25, 2025
@isaacsas isaacsas reopened this Apr 25, 2025
neqs = length(eqs)
symbolic_incidence = symbolic_incidence[eqs_to_retain]

# sort equations lexicographically to reduce simplification issues
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Put a structural simplify keyword argument to flag this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Cancelled CI to avoid running it twice

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 30bf372 into SciML:master Apr 25, 2025
41 of 44 checks passed
@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal deleted the as/lex-sort-eqs branch April 25, 2025 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants