- 
          
- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 233
          Forward split to mtkcompile
          #3875
        
          New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| simplify = false, | ||
| eval_expression = false, | ||
| eval_module = @__MODULE__, | ||
| split = true, | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Introducing this argument with default true is likely breaking considering that the existing default in mtkcompile is false?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked against MTK for the default.
ModelingToolkit.jl/src/systems/systems.jl
Line 31 in 873bf7e
| sys::AbstractSystem; additional_passes = [], simplify = false, split = true, | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah, I must have confused the meaning of split in my head, sorry about the noise then :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I dislike having multiple places where a default is defined/ repeated since that can be error prone)
I don't know what pattern mtk follows for these cases if it has one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
split=true is whether to use MTKParameters while putting everything into one vector. This has been the default for a bit now.
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Ref #3859
Add any other context about the problem here.