Skip to content

Conversation

@dcourteville
Copy link
Contributor

@dcourteville dcourteville commented Dec 30, 2025

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

cf. SciML/DiffEqBase.jl#1234 & #765

@dcourteville
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now all solvers pass the zero-tolerance tests except Muller (because it's not an actual bracketing solver) and Falsi (because it's not numerically stable at very low tolerance).

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 3ce99e9 into SciML:master Dec 31, 2025
60 of 85 checks passed
oscardssmith added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2025
oscardssmith added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants