Skip to content

Allow configuration of the initialization done after interpolation while applying an affect #2507

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Allow configuration of the initialization done after interpolation while applying an affect #2507

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e49655b
Allow configuration of the initialization done during the pre-affect …
BenChung Oct 31, 2024
f46d651
Change reinitialization_method to reinitialize_alg
BenChung Nov 4, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions lib/OrdinaryDiffEqCore/src/integrators/integrator_interface.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
# Hence, we need to have two separate functions.

function _change_t_via_interpolation!(integrator, t,
modify_save_endpoint::Type{Val{T}}) where {T}
modify_save_endpoint::Type{Val{T}}, reinitialization_method=nothing) where {T}
Copy link
Member

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas Nov 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
modify_save_endpoint::Type{Val{T}}, reinitialization_method=nothing) where {T}
modify_save_endpoint::Type{Val{T}}, initialize_alg=nothing) where {T}

Copy link
Member

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas Nov 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

either this or callback_initializealg? The choice here doesn't follow the naming conventions or the other names.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@BenChung BenChung Nov 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about reinitalize_alg? I'm not super happy with simply calling it initialize_alg because it doesn't answer the question of "why does something that occurs mid-solve need to do initialization?" While "reinitialize" doesn't capture that super clearly, I think it's more obvious then just initialize_alg.

# Can get rid of an allocation here with a function
# get_tmp_arr(integrator.cache) which gives a pointer to some
# cache array which can be modified.
Expand All @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ function _change_t_via_interpolation!(integrator, t,
end
integrator.t = t
integrator.dt = integrator.t - integrator.tprev
DiffEqBase.reeval_internals_due_to_modification!(integrator)
DiffEqBase.reeval_internals_due_to_modification!(integrator; callback_initializealg=reinitialization_method)
if T
solution_endpoint_match_cur_integrator!(integrator)
end
Expand All @@ -28,10 +28,10 @@ function DiffEqBase.change_t_via_interpolation!(integrator::ODEIntegrator,
t,
modify_save_endpoint::Type{Val{T}} = Val{
false,
}) where {
}, reinitialization_method=nothing) where {
T,
}
_change_t_via_interpolation!(integrator, t, modify_save_endpoint)
_change_t_via_interpolation!(integrator, t, modify_save_endpoint, reinitialization_method)
return nothing
end

Expand Down
Loading