-
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 235
SciMLLogging Integration #2895
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
SciMLLogging Integration #2895
Conversation
|
will need SciML/SciMLBase.jl#1159 to fully work |
|
Since you are already working on the logging system, is there any chance that we can have additional logging messages for the time integration loop at trace level to debug issues in the timestepping itself? Or is that too costly? |
|
We are splitting that to a different step. First let's get the infrastructure together, then add new messages.
Never! If it's super costly, just put it in the All preset only. Semi? |
|
At this point anything that was behind a Currently, the For the Linear solves and Nonlinear solves I set verbose to |
|
is this ready to review? |
|
Yep, ready to be looked at. |
|
Lots of test failures |
Checklist
contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
COLPRAC.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.