feat: prettyprint parameters #114
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
I think Term isn't that lightweight, but PrettyTables would be a more lightweight alternative. |
Member
Author
|
@AayushSabharwal I think this is ready |
AayushSabharwal
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
Member
Author
|
is this good to merge? |
Member
Author
|
bump |
Member
|
My bad 😅 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use Term tables to pretty-print parameters. Using Term seems like a reasonably lightweight solution but if there are other better options here let me know. May need to figure out how to truncate the table size for larger systems. Fixes SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl#2651
