This repository contains parameter files and reference solutions in order to run and evaluate SeisSol in an automated CI.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
Reference computed on December 15 2022, with commit 64cc387e.
With slight modification: Fault is smaller, but does not break up to the boundaries within 2s.
Reference computed on August 31, 2023, with commit 7fde4778.
With a coarse mesh with approximately 2.7k elements, and order 6: the simulation is just to verify that the fused simulations give consistent results and the physics may not make sense given the coarse mesh. We have energies and receivers to compare for now. These precomputed solutions consider elastic WP, LSW, and plasticity. Reference computed on July 24, 2025, with commit 2dbe03e5
With a coarse mesh with approximately 2.7k elements, and order 6: the simulation is to verify that fused simulations with plasticity varying across simulations give consistent results, and the physics may not make sense given the coarse mesh. We have energies and receivers to compare for now. These precomputed solutions consider elastic WP, LSW, and plasticity. Reference computed on August 29, 2025, with commit 34c6c54a
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
Note: There seems to be something broken with the traction part of the faultreceiver output on the master branch as it outputs strange values. In particular the quantity Ts0 at initial time does not have the same value as T_s in the header.
Reference computed on September 11 2023, with commit 1786163f.
Reference computed on August 31, 2023, with commit 9b1b0ec9.
This is not a SCEC benchmark, but SISMOWINE benchmark for anisotropic materials.
Reference computed on September 26, 2023 with commit be34d26c.
This is not a SCEC benchmark, but SISMOWINE benchmark for elastic materials.
In particular this test is aimed at the fused simulation feature. It tests an ensemble of 8 simulations.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
This is not a SCEC benchmark, but rather a verification setup for the imposed slip friction law with Yoffe slip function.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
This is not a SCEC benchmark, but rather a verification setup for the imposed slip friction law with Gaussian slip function.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
This is a version of TPV5, which is nucleated with the nucleation stress method.
This feature does not work properly on the master branch.
We used a hotfix-branch to compute this reference.
Reference computed on July 20, with commit 1728b83a.
This is a viscoelastic version of TPV5.
Reference computed on August 31, 2023 with commit 9b1b0ec.
This is a poroelastic version of TPV5.
The rupture is nucleated by a fluid pressure pertubation at the initial time.
Reference computed on August 19, 2025 with commit f0b153bfbf69c63e213651470ed8fd3fab412863.
Reference computed on July 15 2022, with commit 153338af.
The reference was computed on July 22 2025, using commit 340af314176398c7e9313219ba851144418551b6, and a dense memory layout.
On the master branch an output variable is wrongly named ASI. As a postprocessing step the variable name has been changed to ASl.
LOH1, but with a Scholte wave running on it instead of point sources.
The reference was computed with b5266c87a7b6bb7de3aeb9dc2fb6c9053452ece1 on 2025-09-04.
A tpv5 mesh with four nucleations in different regions in the fault, triggering sequentially. Computed with 84a1862a570eedc7835da63f28788475c8afc0f9, but the Yateto submodule as of 3bca92b35c35225f104a4093825717746f5d0982.