Skip to content

Conversation

@harshgajera101
Copy link

@harshgajera101 harshgajera101 commented Aug 7, 2025

User description

🔧 What this PR does

This pull request adds inline documentation to the ESLint configuration file (eslint.config.js). The comments explain the purpose of various plugins, rules, and environment settings used in the configuration.

📖 Motivation

As a new contributor, I noticed that the configuration file could benefit from clearer inline comments to help others (especially first-time contributors) understand the reasoning behind various linting rules and plugin choices.

✅ Changes Made

  • Added comments explaining:
    • Plugin imports and their roles
    • ESLint environment options
    • Mocha and Node-specific rule configurations
    • Prettier formatting rules
  • No actual functional/code logic was changed

🔍 Verification

  • ✅ Ran eslint . to ensure configuration still works
  • ✅ Ensured no rules were modified, only comments added

📎 Related Issues

N/A – This is a general documentation improvement.

🙋‍♀️ Additional Notes

If this style of documentation is welcome, I would be happy to extend it to other parts of the configuration or tooling files in the project.


Thank you for reviewing this!


PR Type

Documentation


Description

  • Added comprehensive inline comments to ESLint configuration

  • Documented plugin imports, rules, and environment settings

  • Improved code readability for new contributors

  • No functional changes to linting behavior


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["ESLint Config"] --> B["Plugin Imports"]
  A --> C["Language Options"]
  A --> D["Rule Definitions"]
  B --> E["Added Comments"]
  C --> F["Added Comments"]
  D --> G["Added Comments"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Documentation
eslint.config.js
Enhanced ESLint config with comprehensive documentation   

javascript/selenium-webdriver/eslint.config.js

  • Added detailed inline comments explaining plugin imports and their
    purposes
  • Documented language options, globals, and parser settings
  • Added explanations for each ESLint rule configuration
  • Clarified Prettier formatting options with inline descriptions
+65/-25 

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@selenium-ci selenium-ci added the C-nodejs JavaScript Bindings label Aug 7, 2025
@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No major issues detected

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
General
Fix incorrect rule description

The comment incorrectly describes the rule's purpose. The n/no-mixed-requires
rule actually disallows mixing core modules, file modules, and npm modules in
the same require statement block.

javascript/selenium-webdriver/eslint.config.js [101]

-// Enforce either all `require` at top or dynamic—not both
+// Disallow mixing different types of requires (core, file, npm) in same block

[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the comment for the n/no-mixed-requires rule is misleading and provides an accurate description, which is valuable as the PR's goal is to add explanatory comments.

Low
  • More

@cgoldberg
Copy link
Member

We don't need additional unnecessary comments.

If this style of documentation is welcome, I would be happy to extend it to other parts of the configuration or tooling files in the project.

please don't.

@cgoldberg cgoldberg closed this Aug 7, 2025
@harshgajera101 harshgajera101 deleted the doc branch August 7, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants