Fix typos in two files

[Tuscann]

User description

In two files fixed typos and refactor the files.

Fixes #1

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

Motivation and Context

Types of changes

• Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
• Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
• Improved translation
• Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

• I have read the contributing document.
• I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

---

PR Type

enhancement

---

Description

• Refactored InformationTest.java and InteractionTest.java to improve code readability and consistency.
• Fixed indentation, spacing, and formatting issues in both files.
• Enhanced comments for better clarity and understanding of the code.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

InformationTest.java Refactor and improve readability of InformationTest.java  examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InformationTest.java Refactored code for better readability and consistency. Fixed indentation and spacing issues. Improved comments for clarity. +46/-51  InteractionTest.java Refactor and improve readability of InteractionTest.java  examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InteractionTest.java Refactored code for better readability and consistency. Fixed spacing and formatting issues. Enhanced comments for clarity. +17/-19

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for selenium-dev ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	02efbf6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/selenium-dev/deploys/68a0db5ac502a600083c9270
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1889--selenium-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Key issues to review Code Smell The informationWithElements method is quite long and could be split into smaller, more focused methods for better readability and maintainability. Possible Bug The checkInput variable is used before it's declared, which might cause a compilation error.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Use try-with-resources to automatically close the WebDriver Consider using a try-with-resources statement to ensure that the WebDriver is closed properly, even if an exception occurs during the test execution. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InformationTest.java [17-64] -WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver(); -driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(Duration.ofMillis(500)); -// Navigate to Url -driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html"); -... -driver.quit(); +try (WebDriver driver = new ChromeDriver()) { + driver.manage().timeouts().implicitlyWait(Duration.ofMillis(500)); + // Navigate to Url + driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html"); + ... + // No need for explicit driver.quit() here +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion is a best practice that ensures the WebDriver is closed properly, even if an exception occurs, improving resource management and reliability of the test.	9
Maintainability	Use a constant for the test URL instead of hardcoding it Consider using a constant or a configuration file for the URL instead of hardcoding it in the test method. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InteractionTest.java [11] -driver.get("https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html"); +private static final String TEST_URL = "https://www.selenium.dev/selenium/web/inputs.html"; +... +driver.get(TEST_URL); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion improves maintainability by avoiding hardcoded values, making it easier to update the URL in the future if needed.	8
Enhancement	✅ Use assertTrue for boolean assertions instead of assertEquals with true Suggestion Impact: The commit changed boolean assertions from assertEquals(..., true) to assertTrue(...) for isDisplayed, isEnabled, and isSelected checks. code diff: + // isDisplayed + // Get boolean value for is element display + boolean isEmailVisible = driver.findElement(By.name("email_input")).isDisplayed(); + assertTrue(isEmailVisible); - // isEnabled - // Returns true if element is enabled else returns false - boolean isEnabledButton = driver.findElement(By.name("button_input")).isEnabled(); - assertEquals(isEnabledButton, true); + // isEnabled + // returns true if element is enabled else returns false + boolean isEnabledButton = driver.findElement(By.name("button_input")).isEnabled(); + assertTrue(isEnabledButton); - // isSelected - // Returns true if element is checked else returns false - boolean isSelectedCheck = driver.findElement(By.name("checkbox_input")).isSelected(); - assertEquals(isSelectedCheck, true); + // isSelected + // returns true if element is checked else returns false + boolean isSelectedCheck = driver.findElement(By.name("checkbox_input")).isSelected(); + assertTrue(isSelectedCheck); Replace the boolean literal true with the actual boolean value in the assertions to improve readability and make the test more self-explanatory. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InformationTest.java [24-25] boolean isEmailVisible = driver.findElement(By.name("email_input")).isDisplayed(); -assertEquals(isEmailVisible, true); +assertTrue(isEmailVisible); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Using assertTrue improves readability and makes the test more self-explanatory, which is a good enhancement for code clarity.	7
	Use assertFalse for boolean assertions instead of assertEquals with false Consider using JUnit's assertFalse method instead of assertEquals when checking if a boolean value is false. This improves readability and provides a more specific assertion. examples/java/src/test/java/dev/selenium/elements/InteractionTest.java [16-17] -Boolean isChecked = checkInput.isSelected(); -assertEquals(isChecked, false); +boolean isChecked = checkInput.isSelected(); +assertFalse(isChecked); Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Using assertFalse enhances readability and provides a more specific assertion, which is a beneficial enhancement for code clarity.	7

[A1exKH]

LGTM.

[Tuscann]

LGTM.

I am not sure what is next step this pull request to go in main branch?