Skip to content

Conversation

@lauri457
Copy link
Contributor

PR Description:

replace this with your description

Pull Request Checklist

Overview

  • Put an x inside of the square brackets to check each item.
  • I have read and understood the CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines
  • My pull request has a descriptive title that accurately reflects the changes and the description has been filled in above.
  • I've included only files relevant to the changes described in the PR title and description
  • I've created a new branch in my forked repository for this contribution

Code Quality

  • My code is relevant to ServiceNow developers
  • My code snippets expand meaningfully on official ServiceNow documentation (if applicable)
  • I've disclosed use of ES2021 features (if applicable)
  • I've tested my code snippets in a ServiceNow environment (where possible)

Repository Structure Compliance

  • I've placed my code snippet(s) in one of the required top-level categories:
    • Core ServiceNow APIs/
    • Server-Side Components/
    • Client-Side Components/
    • Modern Development/
    • Integration/
    • Specialized Areas/
  • I've used appropriate sub-categories within the top-level categories
  • Each code snippet has its own folder with a descriptive name

Documentation

  • I've included a README.md file for each code snippet
  • The README.md includes:
    • Description of the code snippet functionality
    • Usage instructions or examples
    • Any prerequisites or dependencies
    • (Optional) Screenshots or diagrams if helpful

Restrictions

  • My PR does not include XML exports of ServiceNow records
  • My PR does not contain sensitive information (passwords, API keys, tokens)
  • My PR does not include changes that fall outside the described scope

@ravichandra1998g ravichandra1998g self-assigned this Oct 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ravichandra1998g ravichandra1998g left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @lauri457

Thank you for your contribution.

There are many community threads on advancing a hung workflow. Below is one of the examples.

https://www.servicenow.com/community/servicenow-ai-platform-forum/workflow-issue-a-workflow-is-struck-in-an-activity-and-doesnot/td-p/1093522/page/2

  • At Hactoberfest, we are aiming for unique code snippet contributions that will be helpful for the open source.

  • Since this use case is already available in various ServiceNow community threads, this PR will not be merged.
    You can expand the code snippet with additional use cases/examples.

Closing this for now. Once you make additional changes, feel free to re-open this Pull Request or create a new one.

@lauri457
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @ravichandra1998g thanks, that's a valid point but wouldn't the presence of a similar snippet in the repo make more sense to be cause for rejection. Seeing as there is a recent merged PR that shows how to use glideajax this rule seems arbitrary

@lauri457 lauri457 deleted the fixscripts/workflowNudger branch October 20, 2025 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants