Conversation
2381545 to
4e0dc10
Compare
Member
Author
|
open-telemetry#1102 opened to upstream this |
5f6e044 to
7092c1a
Compare
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
|
Closed as inactive. Feel free to reopen if this PR is still being worked on. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Detect JIT frames produced by ruby's yjit / zjit to enable the ruby interpreter to still work if jit is in use.
Why
yjit is a substantial improvement to performance, but currently breaks the ruby interpreter as it will never run, since the PC for the interpreter is never called - the whole point of JIT is to avoid the interpreter after all.
How
We use the
SynchronizeMappingshook to detect the ruby JIT address range, and if the PC is in this range we will push a dummy frame to indicate that the leaf is some JIT code.In the future, we can support the linux jit interface to symbolize these, but for now we just push a dummy frame.
Since Ruby's jit works by just running native code replacing the ISEQ of the leaf CME, we can just switch to unwinding the ruby stack once we detect a JIT frame.
However, since we cannot be guaranteed base pointers are available (and even if they are, we don't seem to be able to further unwind correctly with the native unwinder), we can't switch back to native unwinding once we have detected a JIT frame on the stack. This means that if JIT is enabled, we don't get the "interleaved" native and ruby stacks anymore, but we do still get the native frames on the edge of the stack which are probably the most interesting: