fix(deps): update module github.com/urfave/cli/v3 to v3.3.8

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
github.com/urfave/cli/v3	v3.3.2 -> v3.3.8

---

Release Notes

urfave/cli (github.com/urfave/cli/v3)

v3.3.8

Compare Source

v3.3.7

Compare Source

What's Changed

• fix: add missing IsLocal for BoolWithInverseFlag by @​huiyifyj in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2151
• Fix OnUsageError Trigger When Error Is Caused by Mutually Exclusive Flags by @​Ali-Doustkani in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2152

New Contributors

• @​Ali-Doustkani made their first contribution in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2152

Full Changelog: urfave/cli@v3.3.6...v3.3.7

v3.3.6

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Fish completions with identically named sub-commands now work by @​bittrance in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2130

Full Changelog: urfave/cli@v3.3.5...v3.3.6

v3.3.5

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Fix:(issue_2137) Ensure default value for bool with inverse flag is h… by @​dearchap in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2138
• Fix:(issue_2131) Show help text for BoolWithInverseFlag by @​Juneezee in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2142

Full Changelog: urfave/cli@v3.3.4...v3.3.5

v3.3.4

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Fix Docs(issue_2125) Add PathFlag to StringFlag migration by @​dearchap in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2136
• fix: remove extraneous space from subcommand help template by @​G-Rath in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2140
• Fix:(issue_2135) Correct formatting of default subcommand USAGE text by @​zzspoon in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2139

New Contributors

• @​zzspoon made their first contribution in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2139

Full Changelog: urfave/cli@v3.3.3...v3.3.4

v3.3.3

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Simpler top-level context detection for fish completions by @​bittrance in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2121
• Fish completion inside hidden commands by @​bittrance in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2122
• chore(deps): bump golangci/golangci-lint-action from 7 to 8 by @​dependabot in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2123
• fix: off-by-one in timestamp parsing by @​nickajacks1 in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2127
• Fish completions tests invokes setup by @​bittrance in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2124
• Fix docs by @​dearchap in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2128

New Contributors

• @​nickajacks1 made their first contribution in https://github.com/urfave/cli/pull/2127

Full Changelog: urfave/cli@v3.3.2...v3.3.3

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This pull request updates the github.com/urfave/cli/v3 module from version v3.3.2 to v3.3.3, ensuring the project uses the latest patch release and corresponding dependency checksums.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated github.com/urfave/cli/v3 dependency from v3.3.2 to v3.3.3.	Changed version of github.com/urfave/cli/v3 in go.mod from v3.3.2 to v3.3.3. Updated go.sum to reflect new dependency version.	go.mod go.sum

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[llamapreview]

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

Review Status: Automated Review Skipped

Dear contributor,

Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.

Analysis Result:

PR only contains version updates and formatting changes

Technical Context:

Version and formatting changes detected, which include:

• Package version updates
• Dependency version changes
• Code formatting adjustments
• Whitespace modifications
• Structural formatting changes

We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.

Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team