|
| 1 | +name: 📝 Detailed Feature Proposal |
| 2 | +description: Propose a new feature or improvement |
| 3 | +labels: ["proposal"] |
| 4 | +body: |
| 5 | + - type: markdown |
| 6 | + attributes: |
| 7 | + value: | |
| 8 | + **Feature Proposal for Cline** |
| 9 | +
|
| 10 | + Thank you for creating a feature proposal for Cline! This template is for clear, actionable proposals that define a specific problem and a high-confidence solution. Please provide enough detail to enable fast prioritization, discussion, and execution. |
| 11 | +
|
| 12 | + Detailed proposals will be prioritized, while vague proposals may be closed or require extensive back and forth communication. |
| 13 | +
|
| 14 | + Before submitting: |
| 15 | + - Search existing [Issues](https://github.com/cline/cline/issues) and [Discussions](https://github.com/cline/cline/discussions) to avoid duplicates |
| 16 | + - Don’t start implementation until the proposal is reviewed and approved |
| 17 | +
|
| 18 | + - type: textarea |
| 19 | + id: problem-description |
| 20 | + attributes: |
| 21 | + label: What problem does this solve? |
| 22 | + description: | |
| 23 | + Describe the problem clearly from a user's point of view. Focus on why this matters, who it affects, and when it occurs. |
| 24 | +
|
| 25 | + ✅ Solid: |
| 26 | + - "LLM provider returns 400 error when nearing the context window instead of truncating" |
| 27 | + - "Submit button is invisible in dark mode" |
| 28 | +
|
| 29 | + ❌ Avoid: |
| 30 | + - "Performance is bad" |
| 31 | + - "UI needs work" |
| 32 | +
|
| 33 | + Your description should include: |
| 34 | + - Who is affected? |
| 35 | + - When does it happen? |
| 36 | + - What's the current vs expected behavior? |
| 37 | + - What is the impact? |
| 38 | + placeholder: Be specific about the problem, who it affects, and the impact. |
| 39 | + validations: |
| 40 | + required: true |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | + - type: textarea |
| 43 | + id: proposed-solution |
| 44 | + attributes: |
| 45 | + label: What’s the proposed solution? |
| 46 | + description: | |
| 47 | + Describe how the problem should be solved. Be specific about UX, system behavior, and any flows that would change. |
| 48 | +
|
| 49 | + ✅ Solid: |
| 50 | + - "Add error handling immediately after attempting to create the llm stream and retry after manually truncating" |
| 51 | + - "Update button styling to ensure contrast in all themes" |
| 52 | +
|
| 53 | + ❌ Avoid: |
| 54 | + - "Improve performance" |
| 55 | + - "Fix the bug" |
| 56 | +
|
| 57 | + Your solution should include: |
| 58 | + - What exactly will change? |
| 59 | + - How will users interact with it? |
| 60 | + - What’s the expected outcome? |
| 61 | + placeholder: Describe the proposed changes and how they solve the problem. |
| 62 | + validations: |
| 63 | + required: true |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | + - type: textarea |
| 66 | + id: acceptance-criteria |
| 67 | + attributes: |
| 68 | + label: How will we know it works? (Acceptance Criteria) |
| 69 | + description: Define clear, testable success criteria. |
| 70 | + placeholder: Provide specific and testable conditions for success. |
| 71 | + validations: |
| 72 | + required: true |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + - type: textarea |
| 75 | + id: estimated-effort |
| 76 | + attributes: |
| 77 | + label: Estimated effort and complexity |
| 78 | + description: | |
| 79 | + Help us understand scope and risks. Include: |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | + - Size estimate (XS/S/M/L/XL or hours/days) |
| 82 | + - Why this size? What’s technically involved? |
| 83 | + - Any tricky parts, refactors, or risks? |
| 84 | + - Performance or compatibility concerns? |
| 85 | + - Any dependencies on systems, teams, or libraries? |
| 86 | + placeholder: Size, reasoning, risks, and dependencies. |
| 87 | + validations: |
| 88 | + required: true |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | + - type: textarea |
| 91 | + id: technical-considerations |
| 92 | + attributes: |
| 93 | + label: Technical considerations, tradeoffs, and/or risks (optional) |
| 94 | + description: | |
| 95 | + Include any technical context that helps us evaluate or implement the proposal more effectively. |
| 96 | +
|
| 97 | + You may include: |
| 98 | + - Architectural changes or required refactors |
| 99 | + - Performance implications or system-level impacts |
| 100 | + - Known limitations, risks, or tricky edge cases |
| 101 | + - Compatibility concerns or migration steps |
| 102 | + - Alternative approaches you considered and why they were not chosen |
| 103 | + - Dependencies on other systems, teams, or libraries |
| 104 | + - Were other approaches considered? Why is this one preferred? |
| 105 | + placeholder: Technical considerations, tradeoffs, and/or risks. |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + - type: textarea |
| 108 | + id: additional-context |
| 109 | + attributes: |
| 110 | + label: Additional context (optional) |
| 111 | + description: Diagrams, mockups, logs, links, or anything else that helps explain or justify the proposal. |
| 112 | + placeholder: Diagrams, mockups, logs, links, or anything else that helps explain or justify the proposal. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | + - type: checkboxes |
| 115 | + id: checklist |
| 116 | + attributes: |
| 117 | + label: Proposal checklist |
| 118 | + options: |
| 119 | + - label: I’ve checked for existing issues or related proposals |
| 120 | + required: true |
| 121 | + - label: I understand this needs review before implementation can start |
| 122 | + required: true |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | + - type: checkboxes |
| 125 | + id: willingness-to-contribute |
| 126 | + attributes: |
| 127 | + label: Interested in implementing this? |
| 128 | + description: Optional |
| 129 | + options: |
| 130 | + - label: Yes, I’d like to help implement this feature |
0 commit comments