Skip to content

Enhance for loops documentation with range details - #350

Open
archydre wants to merge 2 commits into
Sobeston:masterfrom
archydre:patch-1
Open

Enhance for loops documentation with range details#350
archydre wants to merge 2 commits into
Sobeston:masterfrom
archydre:patch-1

Conversation

@archydre

@archydre archydre commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Added explanation of range syntax in Zig for loops.

Added explanation of range syntax in Zig for loops.
Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 2, 2026 14:06

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

The newly added range documentation is factually incorrect about end-inclusivity and how for bounds iteration with 0...

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the Zig “for loops” documentation to explain how range syntax (e.g. 0.. and 0..x) relates to iterating with for, especially when using a range to generate indices alongside a collection.

Changes:

  • Added a short explanation of bounded vs unbounded range syntax (0..x vs 0..) in the for-loops guide.
  • Documented how 0.. is commonly used in for loops to produce indices when paired with a collection.
File summaries
File Description
website/versioned_docs/version-0.15.x/01-language-basics/05-for-loops.mdx Adds range syntax explanation to the for-loops documentation.
Review details
  • Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
  • Comments generated: 1
  • Review effort level: Lite

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

Comment thread website/versioned_docs/version-0.15.x/01-language-basics/05-for-loops.mdx Outdated
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants