Skip to content

Conversation

@rombirli
Copy link
Contributor

@rombirli rombirli commented Jan 5, 2026

No description provided.

@hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod
Copy link
Contributor

hashicorp-vault-sonar-prod bot commented Jan 5, 2026

SONARAPEX-6

@rombirli rombirli added the apex label Jan 5, 2026
@rombirli rombirli requested a review from a team January 5, 2026 11:09
@rombirli rombirli marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2026 12:26
@rombirli rombirli force-pushed the rombirli/SONARAPEX-6-add-compliant-code-example branch from e081c0e to b16bc59 Compare January 6, 2026 10:45
@dorian-burihabwa-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

@rombirli Try and rebase your branch on master to see if you can get it merged. This way you should be able to pull the changes in the apex analyzer.

@rombirli rombirli force-pushed the rombirli/SONARAPEX-6-add-compliant-code-example branch from 6c80088 to dd80be1 Compare January 7, 2026 15:41
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@rombirli rombirli added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 7, 2026
Merged via the queue into master with commit 9059d56 Jan 7, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
@rombirli rombirli deleted the rombirli/SONARAPEX-6-add-compliant-code-example branch January 7, 2026 16:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants