Merged
Conversation
a84b517 to
46d8a20
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jan Schoone <jan.schoone@uhurutec.com> sort project team alphabetically
Signed-off-by: Jan Schoone <jan.schoone@uhurutec.com>
…late Signed-off-by: Jan Schoone <jan.schoone@uhurutec.com> make linter happy
46d8a20 to
46fae93
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in Project Board CW08, this is a proposal to test the CODEOWNERS
feature.
There is the branch restriction template
owner_onlywhich is only applied tothis repository and already contains an alternative to CODEOWNERS but this is
obviously not in use. That's why I just enabled the CODEOWNERS requirement
here.
Also added the project-board group and made this the code owners of the
CODEOWNERS file.