Conversation
|
Should the image_source format always be from the osism repository or should we not be able to host our own images? |
This is up for debate. So far, this hasn't come up. If other people want to host the image, they can probably be added, given that the relevant bodies agree. |
garloff
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Another comment:
We've had standardized image names before. Shouldn't we keep them as a recommendation? This would reduce the chance for breakage of customer automation ...
2991d81 to
f0b72ff
Compare
5e28c16 to
74d2a30
Compare
b2b04fa to
20662fc
Compare
|
I think this draft(!) has seen enough scrutiny for a first merge. We still need to supply tests, though. |
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Co-authored-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Büchse <matthias.buechse@alasca.cloud>
Signed-off-by: Marvin Frommhold <depressiveRobot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de>
|
@mbuechse I concur. Merged! |
|
@fkr We just have to keep the tests in mind before we stabilize. The issue template for stabilizing has this on the checklist, but the template is not often used ;) |
Closes #933