Skip to content

Conversation

alejoe91
Copy link
Member

@alejoe91 alejoe91 commented Sep 26, 2025

This PR improves the interaction with the library by adding:

  • a get_tags_in_library() to get available probeinterface_library tags
  • a list_manufacturers_in_library(tag=None) to retrieve available manufacturers
  • a list_probes_in_library(manufacturer, tag=None) to get probes from a manufacturer

this should solve a couple of issues: #362 SpikeInterface/probeinterface_library#20

Note: there is no release yet in probeinterface_library, but one should be on the way: SpikeInterface/probeinterface_library#25

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 79.06977% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.39%. Comparing base (d385af8) to head (965ccb0).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/probeinterface/library.py 78.82% 18 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #364      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.92%   89.39%   -0.53%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        2044     2112      +68     
==========================================
+ Hits         1838     1888      +50     
- Misses        206      224      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@alejoe91
Copy link
Member Author

alejoe91 commented Oct 7, 2025

@samuelgarcia done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant