Add CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)#28
Open
anshulchikhale30-p wants to merge 5 commits intoStabilityNexus:mainfrom
Open
Add CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)#28anshulchikhale30-p wants to merge 5 commits intoStabilityNexus:mainfrom
anshulchikhale30-p wants to merge 5 commits intoStabilityNexus:mainfrom
Conversation
Simplifies the repository for a 1-week exploratory prototype focused on self-issued identity NFTs and on-chain endorsements, aligned with DIT 2026.
Fix typo in feedback and contribution section
Added configuration for CodeRabbit integration, enabling auto-replies, issue labeling, and review processes.
Contributor
|
Warning Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a comprehensive CodeRabbit YAML configuration file enabling IDE autocompletion, review automation, issue enrichment, and multi-tool review workflows with specific rules and settings across nine major configuration sections. Removes two lines from README.md closing text. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
34-34:profile: assertive+request_changes_workflow: trueis an aggressive combination — verify intent.With these two settings active together, CodeRabbit will flag style-level nits (assertive) and formally request changes on the PR, potentially blocking merges until every nitpick is resolved. This may create friction for contributors on a prototype/exploratory repository.
If the goal is visibility without blocking, consider
request_changes_workflow: false(leave comments only).Also applies to: 68-68
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 34, The .coderabbit.yaml currently sets profile: assertive together with request_changes_workflow: true which will both flag style-level nits and automatically request changes on PRs; update the configuration to align intent by either changing profile to chill if you want fewer style nit reports, or setting request_changes_workflow: false if you want assertive visibility without blocking merges, and document the chosen behavior so reviewers know whether CodeRabbit should only comment (request_changes_workflow: false) or actively block (request_changes_workflow: true).
217-217: Redundant single-element brace expansion in glob pattern.
**/*.{py}is equivalent to**/*.py; the braces add no value. Same applies to**/*.test.{sol}at line 260.♻️ Proposed fix
- - path: "**/*.{py}" + - path: "**/*.py"- - path: "**/*.test.{sol}" + - path: "**/*.test.sol"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 217, Replace the redundant brace expansions in the glob patterns: change "**/*.{py}" to "**/*.py" and "**/*.test.{sol}" to "**/*.test.sol" in the .coderabbit.yaml glob list (look for the path entries containing "**/*.{py}" and "**/*.test.{sol}" and update those string values accordingly).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 170-186: The instructions block for path "**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
currently contains irrelevant NextJS/React/PWA/SPA/Node.js guidance (the
"NextJS:" and many React-specific bullets) which causes spurious review noise
for this Solidity/EVM repo; remove those NextJS/React/PWA/SPA/Node.js bullets
and trim the block to only cross-cutting JS/TS concerns such as type safety
(avoid 'any', prefer "import type"), security checks, i18n, and
linting/performance guidelines so the "TypeScript:" section and its useful
bullets remain and the review engine will no longer flag unrelated client-side
best-practices for tooling/test scripts.
- Around line 153-166: The global review directives currently placed under
reviews.instructions are ignored because the reviews object forbids
additionalProperties; move that block into reviews.path_instructions using a
catch-all glob (e.g., "**/*") so the directives apply to all files, updating the
key from instructions to path_instructions and nesting the same rules under that
glob entry; locate the reviews.instructions block in .coderabbit.yaml and
replace it with an equivalent reviews.path_instructions entry containing the
same directives.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 34: The .coderabbit.yaml currently sets profile: assertive together with
request_changes_workflow: true which will both flag style-level nits and
automatically request changes on PRs; update the configuration to align intent
by either changing profile to chill if you want fewer style nit reports, or
setting request_changes_workflow: false if you want assertive visibility without
blocking merges, and document the chosen behavior so reviewers know whether
CodeRabbit should only comment (request_changes_workflow: false) or actively
block (request_changes_workflow: true).
- Line 217: Replace the redundant brace expansions in the glob patterns: change
"**/*.{py}" to "**/*.py" and "**/*.test.{sol}" to "**/*.test.sol" in the
.coderabbit.yaml glob list (look for the path entries containing "**/*.{py}" and
"**/*.test.{sol}" and update those string values accordingly).
Comment on lines
+153
to
+166
| instructions: >- | ||
| - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes | ||
| - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices | ||
| - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests | ||
| - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives | ||
| - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed | ||
| - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code | ||
| - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible | ||
| - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec | ||
| - Look for code duplication | ||
| - Suggest code completions when: | ||
| - seeing a TODO comment | ||
| - seeing a FIXME comment | ||
|
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
reviews.instructions is not a valid schema field — these global review directives will be silently ignored.
The reviews object in the CodeRabbit v2 schema has additionalProperties: false, and instructions is not among its defined properties. As a result, the entire block of global review rules (doc-quality, copyright checks, NatSpec discouragement, TODO/FIXME handling, etc.) at lines 153–166 will have no effect at runtime.
The correct way to apply global instructions to all files is via reviews.path_instructions using a catch-all glob pattern:
🛠️ Proposed fix — move global instructions into a `path_instructions` catch-all
- # Review instructions that apply to all files
- instructions: >-
- - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
- - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
- - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
- - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
- - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
- - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
- - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
- - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
- - Look for code duplication
- - Suggest code completions when:
- - seeing a TODO comment
- - seeing a FIXME comment
# Custom review instructions for specific file patterns
path_instructions:
+ # Global instructions for all files
+ - path: "**/*"
+ instructions: |
+ - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
+ - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
+ - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
+ - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
+ - Confirm that copyright years are up-to-date whenever a file is changed
+ - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
+ - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
+ - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
+ - Look for code duplication
+ - Suggest code completions when seeing a TODO or FIXME comment
# TypeScript/JavaScript files📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| instructions: >- | |
| - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes | |
| - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices | |
| - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests | |
| - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives | |
| - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed | |
| - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code | |
| - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible | |
| - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec | |
| - Look for code duplication | |
| - Suggest code completions when: | |
| - seeing a TODO comment | |
| - seeing a FIXME comment | |
| # Custom review instructions for specific file patterns | |
| path_instructions: | |
| # Global instructions for all files | |
| - path: "**/*" | |
| instructions: | | |
| - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes | |
| - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices | |
| - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests | |
| - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives | |
| - Confirm that copyright years are up-to-date whenever a file is changed | |
| - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code | |
| - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible | |
| - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec | |
| - Look for code duplication | |
| - Suggest code completions when seeing a TODO or FIXME comment | |
| # TypeScript/JavaScript files |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 153 - 166, The global review directives
currently placed under reviews.instructions are ignored because the reviews
object forbids additionalProperties; move that block into
reviews.path_instructions using a catch-all glob (e.g., "**/*") so the
directives apply to all files, updating the key from instructions to
path_instructions and nesting the same rules under that glob entry; locate the
reviews.instructions block in .coderabbit.yaml and replace it with an equivalent
reviews.path_instructions entry containing the same directives.
Comment on lines
+170
to
+186
| - path: "**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" | ||
| instructions: | | ||
| NextJS: | ||
| - Ensure that "use client" is being used | ||
| - Ensure that only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used | ||
| - NextJS best practices (including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods) are used. | ||
|
|
||
| TypeScript: | ||
| - Avoid 'any', use explicit types | ||
| - Prefer 'import type' for type imports | ||
| - Review for significant deviations from Google JavaScript style guide. Minor style issues are not a priority | ||
| - The code adheres to best practices associated with React | ||
| - The code adheres to best practices associated with React PWA | ||
| - The code adheres to best practices associated with SPA | ||
| - The code adheres to best practices recommended by lighthouse or similar tools for performance | ||
| - The code adheres to best practices associated with Node.js | ||
| - The code adheres to best practices recommended for performance |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Next.js / React / PWA / SPA / Node.js instructions are irrelevant for an EVM smart-contracts repository.
This is IdentityTokens-EVM-Contracts — a Solidity/blockchain project. The TS/JS path instruction block enforces Next.js "use client", React PWA best practices, SPA patterns, and expo-secure-store, none of which apply here. Leaving them in will generate spurious review comments on any .ts/.js tooling or test files (e.g., Hardhat/Foundry scripts).
Consider trimming the block to only the cross-cutting concerns that actually apply (type safety, security, i18n):
✂️ Proposed trimmed TS/JS instructions
- path: "**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"
instructions: |
- NextJS:
- - Ensure that "use client" is being used
- - Ensure that only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used
- - NextJS best practices (including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods) are used.
-
TypeScript:
- Avoid 'any', use explicit types
- Prefer 'import type' for type imports
- Review for significant deviations from Google JavaScript style guide. Minor style issues are not a priority
- - The code adheres to best practices associated with React
- - The code adheres to best practices associated with React PWA
- - The code adheres to best practices associated with SPA
- - The code adheres to best practices recommended by lighthouse or similar tools for performance
- - The code adheres to best practices associated with Node.js
- - The code adheres to best practices recommended for performance
Security:
- No exposed API keys or sensitive data
- - Use expo-secure-store for sensitive storage
- - Validate deep linking configurations
- Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
Internationalization:
- User-visible strings should be externalized to resource files (i18n)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 170 - 186, The instructions block for path
"**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}" currently contains irrelevant
NextJS/React/PWA/SPA/Node.js guidance (the "NextJS:" and many React-specific
bullets) which causes spurious review noise for this Solidity/EVM repo; remove
those NextJS/React/PWA/SPA/Node.js bullets and trim the block to only
cross-cutting JS/TS concerns such as type safety (avoid 'any', prefer "import
type"), security checks, i18n, and linting/performance guidelines so the
"TypeScript:" section and its useful bullets remain and the review engine will
no longer flag unrelated client-side best-practices for tooling/test scripts.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds the standardized .coderabbit.yaml configuration file from the AOSSIE Template Repository.
Purpose
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Documentation