feat: Evaluate API

[Stranger6667]

Resolves #314
Resolves #279

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.51852% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 93.87%. Comparing base (cb29647) to head (98190df).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/jsonschema/src/error.rs	85.71%	5 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema/src/lib.rs	85.71%	5 Missing ⚠️
...rates/jsonschema/src/keywords/unevaluated_items.rs	91.30%	4 Missing ⚠️
.../jsonschema/src/keywords/unevaluated_properties.rs	91.30%	4 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema-cli/src/main.rs	96.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
crates/jsonschema/src/evaluation.rs	99.87%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ates/jsonschema/src/keywords/pattern_properties.rs	91.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #859      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.20%   93.87%   +0.67%     
==========================================
  Files          87       78       -9     
  Lines       15371    15980     +609     
==========================================
+ Hits        14327    15002     +675     
+ Misses       1044      978      -66     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #859 will not alter performance

_{Comparing dd/evaluate-2 (98190df) with master (cb29647)}

Summary

✅ 52 untouched
🆕 9 new
⏩ 9 skipped¹

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
🆕	evaluate[CITM/Catalog]	N/A	96.5 ms	N/A
🆕	evaluate[FHIR/Fhir]	N/A	32.6 ms	N/A
🆕	evaluate[Fast/Invalid]	N/A	47.1 µs	N/A
🆕	evaluate[Fast/Valid]	N/A	44 µs	N/A
🆕	evaluate[GeoJSON/Canada]	N/A	3.2 s	N/A
🆕	evaluate[Open API/Zuora]	N/A	698.6 ms	N/A
🆕	evaluate[Swagger/Kubernetes]	N/A	1.1 s	N/A
🆕	evaluate[unevaluated_items]	N/A	110.3 µs	N/A
🆕	evaluate[unevaluated_properties]	N/A	162.3 µs	N/A

Footnotes

1. 9 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[Stranger6667]

Also add it to readme + check if readme still notes output styles from drafts 2019-09 & 2020-12 - maybe should note v1 styles