SB-27408 | Assessment archival to update existing requests

[kumarks1122]

SB-27408 Enhance AssessmentArchival job to handle failure scenarios

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Type of change

Please choose appropriate options.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes in the below checkboxes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

• Ran Test A
• Ran Test B

Test Configuration:

• Software versions:
• Hardware versions:

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[manjudr]

@kumarks1122 @utk14 - Plase make the code changes -

1. In the subclass, define the archival format; each job has its own archival format.
2. Do not include archiving logic in the base class. Allow the subclass to implement, and the base class should take the archival status and update the database.
3. Remove any logs that are no longer required.
4. Eliminate hardcoding the year and week number. For example, (how do we do it here if I only want to archive for a year and a month?)

[manjudr]

Summary.

• week and year is hardcoded in the base class and metastore class.
• Please remove the unwanted logs and printing dataframes.
• Please add a filter logic to filter the collection type (course/survey etc.)

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
19 Code Smells

78.1% Coverage
0.0% Duplication