feat: allow separate operator names for pretty printing#122
Merged
MilesCranmer merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Feb 28, 2025
Merged
feat: allow separate operator names for pretty printing#122MilesCranmer merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
MilesCranmer merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13595121827Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Contributor
Benchmark Results
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is part of the solution to MilesCranmer/PySR#843
Pointed out by @arcusfelis
The next stage is to assign different string representations for
greaterand related operators when in regular printing (used for saving to file) and pretty printing.