Skip to content

Improve extractor Jitpack workaround comment and fix its hash in Gradle build file#12256

Merged
Profpatsch merged 1 commit intoTeamNewPipe:devfrom
Profpatsch:improve-jitpack-workaraund-docs
May 6, 2025
Merged

Improve extractor Jitpack workaround comment and fix its hash in Gradle build file#12256
Profpatsch merged 1 commit intoTeamNewPipe:devfrom
Profpatsch:improve-jitpack-workaraund-docs

Conversation

@Profpatsch
Copy link
Contributor

What is it?

  • Bugfix (user facing)
  • Feature (user facing)
  • Codebase improvement (dev facing)
  • Meta improvement to the project (dev facing)

Description of the changes in your PR

just a chore

Before/After Screenshots/Screen Record

  • Before:
  • After:

Fixes the following issue(s)

  • Fixes #

Relies on the following changes

APK testing

The APK can be found by going to the "Checks" tab below the title. On the left pane, click on "CI", scroll down to "artifacts" and click "app" to download the zip file which contains the debug APK of this PR. You can find more info and a video demonstration on this wiki page.

Due diligence

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/small PRs with less than 50 changed lines label May 6, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented May 6, 2025

@Profpatsch Profpatsch merged commit 088cb83 into TeamNewPipe:dev May 6, 2025
8 checks passed
@AudricV AudricV changed the title build.gradle: Improve jitpack workaround doc & fix hash Improve extractor Jitpack workaround comment and fix its hash in Gradle build file May 7, 2025
@Stypox Stypox mentioned this pull request Jul 17, 2025
11 tasks
@ShareASmile ShareASmile added codequality Improvements to the codebase to improve the code quality bug Issue is related to a bug labels Jul 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Issue is related to a bug codequality Improvements to the codebase to improve the code quality size/small PRs with less than 50 changed lines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants