Composify BaseDescriptionFragment and those who inherit from it

[dustdfg]

What is it?

• Bugfix (user facing)
• Feature (user facing) ⚠️ Your PR must target the refactor branch
• Codebase improvement (dev facing)
• Meta improvement to the project (dev facing)

Description of the changes in your PR

• Composify BaseDescriptionFragment and those who inherit from it

Well probably it should be closed....

Introduced regressions/reasons to close

1. Description now doesn't support hashtags and timestamps (temporarily till TextLinkifier ported to use AnnotatedString)
2. Text contrast is lost (Too little colors to use (or I am just dumb probably both))
3. Composables are not separated in separate files (half of them could be)
4. Composables are members of the Fragment class
5. COMPOSABLES ARE OVERRIDEN (perversion of the highest level, it looks quite elegant though)
6. Scroll is lost (idk, I did everything like did in CommentsSection but it doesn't work)
7. Previous thing was smart and centered tags when there was only one row and just pushed them to left when there are more than one line
8. One big commit
9. I can't remove any of those 8 points mentioned above

Introduced features

1. Now you can select text in a channel info tab 🥳

Before/After Screenshots/Screen Record

• Before:

• After:

APK testing

The APK can be found by going to the "Checks" tab below the title. On the left pane, click on "CI", scroll down to "artifacts" and click "app" to download the zip file which contains the debug APK of this PR. You can find more info and a video demonstration on this wiki page.

Due diligence

• I read the contribution guidelines.
• The proposed changes follow the AI policy.
• I tested the changes using an emulator or a physical device.

[dustdfg]

Original used here ShareUtils... If it matters

[dustdfg]

I am so stupid 🤦‍♀️ No one forces me to generate Metadata Just In Time. I can "generate" it a bit Ahead Of Time and just pass List<Pair<String,AnnotatedString>> for metadata. And remove all the bad points which are about code quality

[dustdfg]

I didn't see #11489 🤦‍♀️