PREEMPT_RT latency performance for SDK 10.1 #137
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bryanbrattlof
requested review from
StaticRocket,
aniket-l,
cshilwant,
praneethbajjuri and
uditkumarti
as code owners
|
New warnings found with rstcheck: |
praneethbajjuri
previously approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
Collaborator
Address this warning |
StaticRocket
requested changes
Dec 18, 2024
Member
StaticRocket
left a comment
StaticRocket
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Content is fine. Just style issues.
cshilwant
previously requested changes
Dec 18, 2024
bryanbrattlof
force-pushed
the
preemptrt
branch
from
7d6cb38 to
f3235fb
Compare
|
New warnings found with rstcheck: |
StaticRocket
previously requested changes
Dec 18, 2024
Update the AM62Ax latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <[email protected]>
Update the AM62Px latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <[email protected]>
Headers named after the SoC platform inside SoC specific documentation is redundant. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <[email protected]>
Update the AM64x latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <[email protected]>
Update the AM62x latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <[email protected]>
bryanbrattlof
force-pushed
the
preemptrt
branch
from
f3235fb to
df902aa
Compare
praneethbajjuri
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2024
cshilwant
dismissed stale reviews from StaticRocket and themself
PR is updated
cshilwant
approved these changes
Dec 22, 2024
Member
|
@StaticRocket / @DhruvaG2000 / @AashvijShenai for final review |
StaticRocket
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2024
Member
StaticRocket
left a comment
StaticRocket
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As much as I'd like to standardize asset locations, we have enough measures in place to prevent issues with people putting images and files near their RST source files. This is fine.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello Everyone!
This small series updates the PREEMPT_RT latency performance numbers for the CoreSDK 10.1 release observed when using a simple CPU based background load.
Happy Hacking
~Bryan