chore: use annotations instead of in house linter #2905
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
realstealthninja
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2024
This reverts commit 41653de.
realstealthninja
added a commit
to realstealthninja/C-Plus-Plus
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
realstealthninja
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of Change
this is a test pull request to check if the annotations are better than the in house linter
Checklist
[ ] Added tests and example, test must pass[ ] Added documentation so that the program is self-explanatory and educational - Doxygen guidelines[ ] Relevant documentation/comments is changed or addedNotes: