Skip to content

Conversation

ngtduc693
Copy link
Contributor

@ngtduc693 ngtduc693 commented Oct 4, 2025

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Comments in areas I changed are up to date
  • I have added comments to hard-to-understand areas of my code
image

@ngtduc693 ngtduc693 marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2025 01:37
@ngtduc693 ngtduc693 requested a review from siriak as a code owner October 4, 2025 01:37
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.62%. Comparing base (79497a6) to head (d746a24).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #535   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.62%   96.62%           
=======================================
  Files         274      274           
  Lines       10835    10824   -11     
  Branches     1535     1534    -1     
=======================================
- Hits        10469    10459   -10     
  Misses        232      232           
+ Partials      134      133    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@siriak siriak requested a review from Copilot October 4, 2025 21:03
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR modernizes the C# codebase by leveraging newer C# language features to improve code conciseness and performance. The changes replace verbose traditional syntax with more modern, idiomatic C# patterns.

  • Replaces verbose LINQ operations with more efficient single-method calls
  • Converts multi-line constructors to concise expression-bodied members using tuple deconstruction
  • Refactors complex conditional logic into ternary expressions and adds performance optimizations using Span

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
DataStructures/Timeline.cs Simplified event removal using RemoveAll instead of Where/ToList/foreach pattern
DataStructures/BinarySearchTree/BinarySearchTree.cs Converted constructors to expression-bodied members with tuple deconstruction
Algorithms/Other/Luhn.cs Refactored conditional logic to ternary expressions and added Span optimization with input validation
Algorithms.Tests/Other/LuhnTests.cs Added comprehensive edge case testing for the modernized Luhn algorithm
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

Algorithms/Other/Luhn.cs:1

  • The test replaces 'x' with '0' but GetLostNum expects the input to contain 'x' to find the missing digit. This test doesn't validate the actual GetLostNum functionality since it removes the 'x' character that the method is designed to process.
namespace Algorithms.Other;

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link
Member

@siriak siriak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@siriak siriak merged commit d3652b1 into TheAlgorithms:master Oct 4, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants