feat!: support for remote dictionaries#1282
Merged
Nickersoft merged 49 commits intomainfrom Sep 14, 2025
Merged
Conversation
0398ea3 to
43def34
Compare
b44dfb3 to
c1cd0d1
Compare
c1cd0d1 to
2ce9296
Compare
04358a5 to
6427f99
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remote dictionary support is here! This PR greatly simplifies how users can use ODict by allowing you to pass remote dictionary identifiers, which will be automatically fetched from ODict's official R2 bucket.
For example, retrieving English Wiktionary in Node is now as simple as: