-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Add support for other HTTP verbs for aggregation aka UpstreamHttpMethod enhancements
#1389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add support for other HTTP verbs for aggregation aka UpstreamHttpMethod enhancements
#1389
Conversation
Cherry picked from ThreeMammals#1389
|
Hi Carl! Could you Sync fork please? So, your develop branch is outdated! |
raman-m
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything is OK.
But we have to write a few acceptance tests which will cover added logic.
Could you write at least one acceptance test please?
5b5bfb0 to
8596743
Compare
|
The feature branch has been rebased onto ThreeMammals:develop! I see that develop branch in your fork is too old! |
8596743 to
d7dee73
Compare
c216cdf to
b458f0f
Compare
908d84f to
0678e7a
Compare
This changes the FileAggregateRoute to allow other verbs.
It is for consumers not following traditional REST. Several APIs do not follow the REST guidelines and may use POST for getting data. In cases like these being able to specify a verb is helpful.