Skip to content

Added getAccountForSite to account service that returns an account entity#525

Merged
vershwal merged 2 commits intomainfrom
refactorGetDefaultAccount
Apr 15, 2025
Merged

Added getAccountForSite to account service that returns an account entity#525
vershwal merged 2 commits intomainfrom
refactorGetDefaultAccount

Conversation

@vershwal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2025

Walkthrough

A new asynchronous method named getAccountForSite was introduced to the AccountService class in the src/account/account.service.ts file. This method takes a Site object as its parameter and returns a Promise that resolves to an Account entity. The implementation of this method delegates the retrieval operation to the accountRepository's getBySite method. The method is documented with a JSDoc comment specifying its purpose and return type. No additional logic, error handling, or modifications to other parts of the codebase were made in this change.

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 948f7ac and 7d8d1cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/account/account.service.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/account/account.service.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build, Test and Push

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/account/account.service.ts (2)

299-306: Consider enhancing the JSDoc comment

The JSDoc comment only mentions the return type but doesn't describe the site parameter. For consistency with other methods in this class, consider adding a parameter description.

 /**
  * Get the account for a site
  *
+ * @param site Site object to get the account for
  * @returns Account Entity
  */
 async getAccountForSite(site: Site): Promise<Account> {
     return this.accountRepository.getBySite(site);
 }

304-306: Consider updating the return type if null is possible

If accountRepository.getBySite(site) can potentially return null when an account isn't found, the return type should be updated to reflect this possibility.

- async getAccountForSite(site: Site): Promise<Account> {
+ async getAccountForSite(site: Site): Promise<Account | null> {
     return this.accountRepository.getBySite(site);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd6fed6 and 948f7ac.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/account/account.service.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/account/account.service.ts (2)
src/account/types.ts (2)
  • Site (4-8)
  • Account (20-38)
src/site/site.service.ts (1)
  • Site (7-11)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/account/account.service.ts (1)

304-306: Verify the distinction between this method and getDefaultAccountForSite

The class already has a getDefaultAccountForSite method with a different implementation. It would be helpful to clarify in the documentation what makes this method different from the existing one.

Can you clarify the difference between getAccountForSite and getDefaultAccountForSite? Is one meant to replace the other, or do they serve different purposes?

Comment on lines +304 to +306
async getAccountForSite(site: Site): Promise<Account> {
return this.accountRepository.getBySite(site);
}

This comment was marked as resolved.

@vershwal vershwal enabled auto-merge (squash) April 15, 2025 05:20
@vershwal vershwal merged commit 16c8209 into main Apr 15, 2025
4 checks passed
@vershwal vershwal deleted the refactorGetDefaultAccount branch April 15, 2025 05:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant