Skip to content

Conversation

penelopeysm
Copy link
Member

@penelopeysm penelopeysm commented May 20, 2025

cf. TuringLang/Turing.jl#2557

check_initial_... is only used when sampling multiple chains (it doesn't check the actual number of parameters in the model because AbstractMCMC has no way of knowing this), so the old error message was arguably misleading.

Copy link
Contributor

AbstractMCMC.jl documentation for PR #163 is available at:
https://TuringLang.github.io/AbstractMCMC.jl/previews/PR163/

@penelopeysm penelopeysm force-pushed the py/initial-params-error branch from d6f10ff to a05e3aa Compare May 20, 2025 16:55
@penelopeysm penelopeysm force-pushed the py/initial-params-error branch from a05e3aa to c67800b Compare May 20, 2025 16:58
@penelopeysm penelopeysm requested a review from sunxd3 May 20, 2025 16:58
Copy link
Member

@sunxd3 sunxd3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG!

@penelopeysm penelopeysm merged commit ececa17 into main May 21, 2025
18 checks passed
@penelopeysm penelopeysm deleted the py/initial-params-error branch May 21, 2025 10:03
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (fdaa0eb) to head (c67800b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #163   +/-   ##
===========================
===========================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants