Skip to content

Conversation

@Roozki
Copy link
Contributor

@Roozki Roozki commented Oct 21, 2025

Forgot about my old branch before merging my "houskeeping" PR. After that pr, merge conficts were really nasty between rowzaw/main (where the latest code is) and main.

I just grabbed the arm source files and pasted them into this PR.

@douglasichen
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not familiar with the old/new code, but if we are updating the code and want to maintain cpp, should we change the ino and c files to be cpp?


// general parameters
#define NUM_AXES 6
#define NUM_AXES 7
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is the num axes increase intentional?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yup, one of the axes is used for the end effector

@Roozki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Roozki commented Oct 28, 2025

I'm not familiar with the old/new code, but if we are updating the code and want to maintain cpp, should we change the ino and c files to be cpp?

that would be good, I'd like to move away from arduino. i think platform IO would be a good choice but im looking into it. it depends on our hardware, I'd like to get away with just makefiles

@Roozki Roozki merged commit 9213d59 into main Oct 28, 2025
1 check passed
@Roozki Roozki deleted the hotfix/rowzaw/consolodate_code_to_main branch October 28, 2025 04:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants