Skip to content

feat(Integration Cards): Improve generation of Configuration Editor#204

Open
dimovpetar wants to merge 8 commits intoUI5:mainfrom
dimovpetar:feat_config_editor
Open

feat(Integration Cards): Improve generation of Configuration Editor#204
dimovpetar wants to merge 8 commits intoUI5:mainfrom
dimovpetar:feat_config_editor

Conversation

@dimovpetar
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dimovpetar dimovpetar marked this pull request as draft January 27, 2026 09:08
@dimovpetar dimovpetar force-pushed the feat_config_editor branch 2 times, most recently from 90c4ef4 to dfedd53 Compare February 2, 2026 15:23
Copy link
Member

@alexandar-mitsev alexandar-mitsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • addition in destinations seems to work well. It can be merged
  • configuration editor is not improved much, but the guidelines can be merged at that stage and we can think what we can do further

- **ALWAYS** make the existing fields in the `manifest.json` configurable via the editor. For example manifest parameters, title, subtitle, icon of the header, etc.
- **NEVER** add fields to the editor that do not exist in the `manifest.json`.
- **ALWAYS** remove fields from the editor when removing them from the `manifest.json`.
- **ALWAYS** add fields in the Configuration Editor when adding them to the `manifest.json`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • add explanation that Configuration.js is the file which holds instructions for the configuration editor

In general the effect of this instructions is not so strong.

  • maybe it is worth it to add to the template common parameters , e.g. maxItems and show how they are used inside the card
  • should we consider a separate tool for this? Maybe worth experimenting.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Explanation is added
  • the template already has title and subtitle configurable
  • this should be discussed

@dimovpetar dimovpetar marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2026 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants